
Moderator: Cartographers
cairnswk wrote:*The water looks interesting!
good or bad, interesting?
well, first, the railhead is actually in Mississippi. second, yes, that is right...one railway can attack another, but only one station up the track.
i.e. Montanas -> Disputed North and Montanas -> Iowa Territory, but Montanas cannot attack Mexico City or Mississippi.
Gemineye wrote:cairnswk wrote:Gemineye....good job on those mountains.
*Can you attack from Montanas to Lago Grande or are the mountains going to be used as unpassable barriers?
unpassable barriers--with the exception of the railway.
Gilligan wrote:So any X can attack any X?
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Skittles! wrote:Gilligan wrote:So any X can attack any X?
Yes, it's a railway. Joining countries together meaning they can attack each other.
I think it's like that, kind of like a water connection or an airport.
johloh wrote:-the english on the railroad station legend needs to be re-written. something like 'is a railroad station, can also attack any connected station' you make it sounds like they can only attack other railroads...
johloh wrote:-'unorganized' is certainly not the best name for an area dominated by native americans. they were definetly organized...
johloh wrote:-should it be sierra nevada, instead of serra nevada?
johloh wrote:-im not a big fan of the squiggly arrows for attacks over rivers...maybe put some bridges on them?
hereje888 wrote:The rivers in "New" mexico are unpassable borders--Because I think that the mountains are enough.
qwert wrote:I dont understand vote question, its these map finish for play?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users