Page 5 of 7
Posted:
Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:46 pm
by Qwert
The letters is very light,can be more darken?
Posted:
Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:57 pm
by Teya
I prefer the previous text as well. I can barely read the small map with the new text.
Posted:
Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:21 am
by Ruben Cassar
Teya wrote:I prefer the previous text as well. I can barely read the small map with the new text.
I agree. However I don't particularly like the previous text either, so could you try some other text options that are more legible?
Posted:
Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:56 am
by WidowMakers
The new text is the exact same font as the old. All I did was make the new style black with a white glow. (Instead of white with a black glow). I will see what happens when I make the text bolder.
Posted:
Sun Jul 15, 2007 7:56 am
by yeti_c
Ruben Cassar wrote:Teya wrote:I prefer the previous text as well. I can barely read the small map with the new text.
I agree. However I don't particularly like the previous text either, so could you try some other text options that are more legible?
Completely disagree - the new text is much more legible?!
Weird... bit like Marmite... some like - some hate!!
C.
Posted:
Sun Jul 15, 2007 9:40 am
by Ruben Cassar
yeti_c wrote:Ruben Cassar wrote:Teya wrote:I prefer the previous text as well. I can barely read the small map with the new text.
I agree. However I don't particularly like the previous text either, so could you try some other text options that are more legible?
Completely disagree - the new text is much more legible?!
Weird... bit like Marmite... some like - some hate!!
C.
As I said I don't like the text used in both versions. Maybe a new font would be better. Why not make a selection of 4 or 5 fonts and put up a poll so that people can vote for the best one?
Posted:
Sun Jul 15, 2007 2:11 pm
by The Fuzzy Pengui
Posted:
Sun Jul 15, 2007 4:28 pm
by KEYOGI
Just look at the text in LaSalle (West End) as a clear example. Maybe it has something to do with eyesight, but I find that label really difficult to read, whereas it couldn't be clearer with the older text.
Posted:
Sun Jul 15, 2007 10:06 pm
by WidowMakers
I will do a couple different things with the text and post them tomorrow. Aside from the text, are there any other issues? If not then once the text is agreed upon we should be set.
Thanks for the input everyone.
WM
Posted:
Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:45 am
by hulmey
some of your border lines are blurred and faint....Noticed quite a few in the purple continent of the big map!!
Posted:
Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:42 pm
by WidowMakers
OK here are 4 different styles. Two fonts and each font has two styles
My fav is #2. Easy to read both large and small
1)
2)
3)
4)
hulmey wrote:some of your border lines are blurred and faint....Noticed quite a few in the purple continent of the big map!!
I don't think it is really an issue. If others do, I will thicken them. I really just wanted to get the text thing settled. Once that is done I will get on this if others feel it is of value.
WM
Posted:
Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:55 pm
by The Fuzzy Pengui
i like both numbers 2 and 4, but i think that number 2 is the easiest to read, and just looks nicer. it just has a montreal feel to it
Posted:
Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:26 pm
by d.gishman
2 is definitely the best one. I wouldn't mind 3 either.
Posted:
Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:40 pm
by AndyDufresne
2 or 3, I'd go with one of those.
--Andy
Posted:
Mon Jul 16, 2007 9:26 pm
by edbeard
2 on the large map
3 on the small map
Posted:
Tue Jul 17, 2007 5:36 am
by gimil
im going with 2 as well
Posted:
Tue Jul 17, 2007 5:37 am
by yeti_c
edbeard wrote:2 on the large map
3 on the small map
Concur.
C.
Posted:
Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:47 am
by KEYOGI
#1 for me. The black text seems to clash with the soft feel of the map. Just my opinion.
Posted:
Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:57 am
by t.e.c
i like number 2, i think it's easier to read but on the smaller map, it seems too small.
it might be cramping things, but could the font be bumped up a point or 2?
Posted:
Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:23 am
by Coleman
yeti_c wrote:edbeard wrote:2 on the large map
3 on the small map
Concur.
I also agree.
Posted:
Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:32 am
by Qwert
2 is look good ,but put to be normal bold not italic bold
Posted:
Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:58 am
by ga7
Definitely 3) for small map
Posted:
Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:14 am
by MR. Nate
I like 3 for both maps.
Posted:
Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:04 pm
by Ruben Cassar
qwert wrote:2 is look good ,but put to be normal bold not italic bold
I agree with qwert on this one.
Also why didn't you put up a poll? It's much better to keep track and easier for people to express their opinions...
Posted:
Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:09 pm
by Coleman
If he'd put up a poll he would have likely said something like "1, 2, 3 or 4" and then we'd still get all this mixing numbers comments and the style change one that qwert gave and I also agree with. In addition to what I said previously, either option really.
Polls in the foundry usually turn to rubbish anyway. Too many people vote without looking at anything.