Conquer Club

[Delete Me]
PLACE THE NAME OF THE SUGGESTION IN THE SUBJECT LINE!

Good greetings to all:
Lets put it to a vote!
Please consider the following question!
Why not eliminate players who miss four (4) Non-Consecutive turns?
By my reasoning skills, there appears to be players who use the strategy or tactic of missing turns on purpose in order to stock troops without risk! Do you agree or not? If you do agree, then what are our alternative options in dealing with this issue. Please join me in requesting the powers that be the website administration of Conquer Club to institute that new rule of eliminating a player who misses four (4) or more turns in a game that are not consecutive!

Thank you for timely consideration of this question!

Any questions, contact one of the Suggestions Moderators.
[/Delete Me]


Concise description:

• xxxxxxx

Specifics/Details:

• xxxxxxx

How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:

• xxxxxxx

This has been suggested before and rejected many times. That strategy you suggested may be used by some, but it isn't a great strategy and it's never been proven that anyone near the top of the scoreboard uses that strategy.

Yeah like he said, rejected....even do it's really annoying when player(s) does that.

I would be in favor of 3 turns period, consecutive or not....

Mad777

No, i like the 3 consecutive turns OR 4 turns total.
Same for poly games, wether or not it s the same colour missing.

I think if you did this, an exception should be made for games with a lot of turns in them, say for every 100 turns in the game they can miss one more.

betiko wrote:No, i like the 3 consecutive turns OR 4 turns total.
Same for poly games, wether or not it s the same colour missing.

Yeah it's super dumb that on poly games its the individual color that has to miss 3 turns, rather than just the player.

rockfist wrote:I think if you did this, an exception should be made for games with a lot of turns in them, say for every 100 turns in the game they can miss one more.

Games aren t really meant to be that long so it's a good way to end stalements. I was actually thinking more of these endless games, with stalements and people missing turns every once in a while. Well, too bad. Missing 4 turns means 4 full days that person has already wasted for all other opponents to enjoy that game.

Yes. I vote yes. Kick the deadbeats out.
btw, why doesn't this thread have a poll?
A 1000 worthless joke polls in the forums but this thread remains poll-less...

That makes very long games pretty difficult, I mean for hard core players it probably would be fine but therse a lot of casual people who might play longer games and miss the occassoinal game. In a long round game, 4 turns might not be that much.

4 and out,
Yes
I don't care what kind of strategy it is, it is annoying. Like a dull toothache.

Or after 4 misses, they get skipped every five turns with no warning of which turn it will be. Just a quick note in the log, "You were skipped this last turn because you seem to like inconsistency, so we gave you more. You are welcome."

The poll is broken.

DoomYoshi wrote:This has been suggested before and rejected many times. That strategy you suggested may be used by some, but it isn't a great strategy and it's never been proven that anyone near the top of the scoreboard uses that strategy.

Indeed, not a good strategy. So few games where this strategy could be helpfull.
Even if annoying

Mad777 wrote:I would be in favor of 3 turns period, consecutive or not....

Same for me

betiko wrote:Same for poly games, wether or not it s the same colour missing.

Exactly, I totally agree that! Sometimes it's 12 miss turn before a total kicking, 12 days!!!!