Conquer Club

Conquer Clue: Complete!!! - LHDD Win!

Abandoned challenges and other old information.

Moderator: Clan Directors

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby IcePack on Mon Oct 16, 2017 4:12 pm

There wasn’t an issue where it wasn’t allowed or not. Fall moved and blocked the door and the other clan moved in the other direction / didn’t try to go into world 2.1
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
User avatar
Major IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16524
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby IcePack on Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:25 pm

Someone proposed we roll initiative every turn to see who starts / what order instead of the fixed “board game” clockwise turnnorder.

If that’s acceptable then it’s a change we can make that doesn’t affect the timeline
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
User avatar
Major IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16524
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby groovysmurf on Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:28 pm

PACK 100% agrees with this
User avatar
Colonel groovysmurf
Clan Director
Clan Director
 
Posts: 2322
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:28 pm
Location: Cleveland, OH

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby Swimmerdude99 on Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:24 pm

I'm okay with that. Sounds like a cool addition
Image
Offsite to 12/31/2023. Reach out to TheSpaceCowboy to reach me
User avatar
Major Swimmerdude99
 
Posts: 2371
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:07 pm
Location: North Carolina
2435

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby MTIceman41 on Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:01 pm

IcePack wrote:Someone proposed we roll initiative every turn to see who starts / what order instead of the fixed “board game” clockwise turnnorder.

If that’s acceptable then it’s a change we can make that doesn’t affect the timeline


agree =D>
Image
User avatar
Brigadier MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1087
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby Jurasu on Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:40 pm

Initiative might help some of the fairness questions, but does it answer all of DJENRE's concerns? From the way I read it, the larger issue he seemed to have was the fact that IcePack having to choose where they ended up after their intended path was blocked was not where they would have chosen to be had they had the chance to be alerted and make a second choice. Because of the dice rolls on the next turn, one spot, which they had not been put on, was more favorable than the spot that they had been put on. Part of it may be hindsight bias, but I thought that was the larger issue being discussed here.

I believe I have that summed up correctly. Based on the fact that IcePack asked us for suggestions that wouldn't significantly increase the game's run-time (which elongating turns and making multiple checks per round would do), wouldn't it be better if teams also included a Plan B when submitting their turns? It was mentioned earlier, but didn't seem to gain any traction. It wouldn't have to be super specific and contain a list of potential coordinates in descending order. It could be a general "If we can't move to this spot, we would like to move towards Map X." That way shouldn't really add any more work for IcePack to do, and it should also cut out the arbitrary factor that has the potential to inadvertently create a disadvantage.


Also, thank you again IcePack for running an interesting game to put a spin on Risk on this site. I'm sure setting this up and running it takes a lot more effort than most of us would want to do, so I appreciate it.
User avatar
Major Jurasu
 
Posts: 183
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:43 pm

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby IcePack on Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:47 pm

Jurasu wrote:Initiative might help some of the fairness questions, but does it answer all of DJENRE's concerns? From the way I read it, the larger issue he seemed to have was the fact that IcePack having to choose where they ended up after their intended path was blocked was not where they would have chosen to be had they had the chance to be alerted and make a second choice. Because of the dice rolls on the next turn, one spot, which they had not been put on, was more favorable than the spot that they had been put on. Part of it may be hindsight bias, but I thought that was the larger issue being discussed here.

I believe I have that summed up correctly. Based on the fact that IcePack asked us for suggestions that wouldn't significantly increase the game's run-time (which elongating turns and making multiple checks per round would do), wouldn't it be better if teams also included a Plan B when submitting their turns? It was mentioned earlier, but didn't seem to gain any traction. It wouldn't have to be super specific and contain a list of potential coordinates in descending order. It could be a general "If we can't move to this spot, we would like to move towards Map X." That way shouldn't really add any more work for IcePack to do, and it should also cut out the arbitrary factor that has the potential to inadvertently create a disadvantage.


Also, thank you again IcePack for running an interesting game to put a spin on Risk on this site. I'm sure setting this up and running it takes a lot more effort than most of us would want to do, so I appreciate it.


I think part of the changing the first person by initiative would also bring balance to the other part, as the same clan wont be dealing with it the whole game.
All will get treated the same way by me but it wont be the same clan every turn having to predict who goes where or might not get the moves they were looking for etc.

Someone else suggested the "alternate path" method via PM i think. Essentially this is "possible" but then it opens the door to a lot of other headaches. For example:
I tried to do alternate turns in the CR@W game and it can be a huge pain. Instead of we move to X it was:

We move to X unless A does B then go to Y but only if Z also does C and if they don’t do either just do Q. Or other such very difficult to follow long involved alternate universes that made it difficult for me to manage in a reasonable time. I’m afraid if we do that here I’ll regret it the same way. Or what happens then when the alternate plan gets blocked...it just goes back to the same add time or icepack decides method which again, isn't ideal for me.

I can't get sucked into another CR@W where each turn takes hours to update, the idea here was it was simple enough and fast enough for me to do on my lunch hour while on site break, and still give clans something to do. So thats 30 mins per turn that I can update basically, otherwise I'm giving up time in the evenings which I'm trying to keep for other things during the fall.
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
User avatar
Major IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16524
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby t4mcr53s2 on Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:02 pm

randomize turn order is also important in 2 ways ; early movers have a chance to block others ( sorry Djenere but what can i do with a one ?) but late movers may get to start 2 games in a turn ; they start a game if someone enters the room they are in and start a game when they enter another room in the same round so
1) yes lets randomize initiatives;
2) people should consider the chance they will be blocked and suggest a second and third spot , or let ice move them as close as possible ( not saying he did this round, i'm not taking the time to analysze that ) but we should take a little extra time as participants to allow the game-master to have an easy life.
I wish either my father or my mother, or indeed both of them as they were in duty both equally bound to it, had minded what they were about when....

If 2 player fog game,please allow 12 hour snap courtesy, or post what I could have seen.... Thank you
User avatar
Colonel t4mcr53s2
 
Posts: 874
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:19 pm
Location: maryland, usa
22

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby Slaylark on Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:06 pm

I vote for whatever makes it easier on the IcePack
User avatar
Corporal Slaylark
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:09 pm
Location: New York

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby DJENRE on Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:15 pm

IcePack wrote:
Jurasu wrote:Initiative might help some of the fairness questions, but does it answer all of DJENRE's concerns? From the way I read it, the larger issue he seemed to have was the fact that IcePack having to choose where they ended up after their intended path was blocked was not where they would have chosen to be had they had the chance to be alerted and make a second choice. Because of the dice rolls on the next turn, one spot, which they had not been put on, was more favorable than the spot that they had been put on. Part of it may be hindsight bias, but I thought that was the larger issue being discussed here.

I believe I have that summed up correctly. Based on the fact that IcePack asked us for suggestions that wouldn't significantly increase the game's run-time (which elongating turns and making multiple checks per round would do), wouldn't it be better if teams also included a Plan B when submitting their turns? It was mentioned earlier, but didn't seem to gain any traction. It wouldn't have to be super specific and contain a list of potential coordinates in descending order. It could be a general "If we can't move to this spot, we would like to move towards Map X." That way shouldn't really add any more work for IcePack to do, and it should also cut out the arbitrary factor that has the potential to inadvertently create a disadvantage.


Also, thank you again IcePack for running an interesting game to put a spin on Risk on this site. I'm sure setting this up and running it takes a lot more effort than most of us would want to do, so I appreciate it.


I think part of the changing the first person by initiative would also bring balance to the other part, as the same clan wont be dealing with it the whole game.
All will get treated the same way by me but it wont be the same clan every turn having to predict who goes where or might not get the moves they were looking for etc.

Someone else suggested the "alternate path" method via PM i think. Essentially this is "possible" but then it opens the door to a lot of other headaches. For example:
I tried to do alternate turns in the CR@W game and it can be a huge pain. Instead of we move to X it was:

We move to X unless A does B then go to Y but only if Z also does C and if they don’t do either just do Q. Or other such very difficult to follow long involved alternate universes that made it difficult for me to manage in a reasonable time. I’m afraid if we do that here I’ll regret it the same way. Or what happens then when the alternate plan gets blocked...it just goes back to the same add time or icepack decides method which again, isn't ideal for me.

I can't get sucked into another CR@W where each turn takes hours to update, the idea here was it was simple enough and fast enough for me to do on my lunch hour while on site break, and still give clans something to do. So thats 30 mins per turn that I can update basically, otherwise I'm giving up time in the evenings which I'm trying to keep for other things during the fall.


Thank you Jurasu, you perfectly understand the matter. =D> =D> =D>
the larger issue he seemed to have was the fact that IcePack having to choose where they ended up after their intended path was blocked was not where they would have chosen to be had they had the chance to be alerted and make a second choice. Because of the dice rolls on the next turn, one spot, which they had not been put on, was more favorable than the spot that they had been put on.
Thank you for your support. ;)

I'm not for giving all alternatives, it will be a brainkiller for Icepack.
Also Ice, many players noticed that one round every 48h (instead 24h actually) won't be a shame because with the actual system, a team can meet 2 or 3 teams in a single round, so a team leader could have to start like 15 games in a single week (because he plays all kind of game).
You know I'm not for the idea you take any decision for any team.
What about giving the roll to all by pm, then having 24 hours to let you know where we move, exactly like we did before.
But there is an additionnal 24 hours period to deal with problems (in case there are problems), but also to edit all moves asken on the thread and ask for type of game to all teams (double, triple, or quad). And also you can create the games.

If there are problems, they can be dealed directly into the thread and team can choose what they want to do in case their move is not correct.

Also I'm for the alternative path, but I think PACK and RET are the teams we have to ask first, as they have more to loose than any other team with this 'new' system.

That's my opinion.
BIG PRIZES! CSOP Hold'em
YOU LIKE MONOPOLY? PLAY IT on CC => CONQUEROPOLY
YOU'RE A MEDAL HUNTER? HUNT ALL THE MEDALS YOU NEED HERE!
BIG TRIBE TOURNAMENT VI NATIONS 2018
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DJENRE
 
Posts: 2057
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:59 am
Location: ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby DJENRE on Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:20 pm

t4mcr53s2 wrote:( sorry Djenere but what can i do with a one ?)

Not your fault, and like we said loveliveteach and myself, we totally forgot about you in front of the door :lol: :lol: :lol:
But that's not the matter. ;)
BIG PRIZES! CSOP Hold'em
YOU LIKE MONOPOLY? PLAY IT on CC => CONQUEROPOLY
YOU'RE A MEDAL HUNTER? HUNT ALL THE MEDALS YOU NEED HERE!
BIG TRIBE TOURNAMENT VI NATIONS 2018
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DJENRE
 
Posts: 2057
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:59 am
Location: ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby t4mcr53s2 on Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:55 pm

Low and LLT fall will be in feudal ( lower left ) care to join us? i figure you will choose game type as second in
I wish either my father or my mother, or indeed both of them as they were in duty both equally bound to it, had minded what they were about when....

If 2 player fog game,please allow 12 hour snap courtesy, or post what I could have seen.... Thank you
User avatar
Colonel t4mcr53s2
 
Posts: 874
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:19 pm
Location: maryland, usa
22

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby ElricTheGreat on Mon Oct 16, 2017 11:00 pm

sorry guys ... I have not read through all of this .. but I believe the gist of it is that there are times when a team can get blocked because of what might have happened before his turn comes along.

The way I see it is the easiest solution would be to modify the rule regarding not letting 2 teams occupy the same location simultaneously ....

So I would suggest one of these options ...

1 - lift the restriction and allow more than 1 to occupy the same location or pass through to the other side and continue its movement to its final destination.
or
2 - Allow teams pass through an occupied location but NOT end the turn in the same location.
---- using a direct line movement to where the intended destination was to be ... IP will move the team token. If there are not enough steps available to safely move to the final destination ... he will move it as far as possible and the token's final destination will be the farthest number of steps where it can rest in an unoccupied location. At no time will the token be allowed to move MORE than the number of spaces equal to the number rolled. If when travelling in a straight line to the intended destination there is no UNOCCUPIED safe landing space then the token remains in place and the turn ends.

so as an example ... the team rolls a 6 ...

steps 4 and 5 are occupied but 6 (final destination) is open then the token moves to step 6.

case 2: roll again a 6 ... step 5 and 6 are occupied .. the token can only move 4 safely so it does so and completes the rest of their turn on location 4. At no time would the token advance past the max number of spots for example skip 5 and 6 to land on the next vacant spot which is #7.

case 3: roll is 6 ... 4 and 6 are occupied so the farthest safe landing for the token would be the 5 step so that is where it stops.


I hope I am expressing my thought properly ... I realise in Clue that double occupancy is not allowed ... but with this little adjustment we can all continue without making IP make any decisions or wait for rerouting.
Image
Stormbringer is thirsty --- Thursting for YOUR Soul!
User avatar
Captain ElricTheGreat
SoC Training Instructor
SoC Training Instructor
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:37 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby DJENRE on Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:53 am

ElricTheGreat wrote:sorry guys ... I have not read through all of this .. but I believe the gist of it is that there are times when a team can get blocked because of what might have happened before his turn comes along.

The way I see it is the easiest solution would be to modify the rule regarding not letting 2 teams occupy the same location simultaneously ....

So I would suggest one of these options ...

1 - lift the restriction and allow more than 1 to occupy the same location or pass through to the other side and continue its movement to its final destination.
or
2 - Allow teams pass through an occupied location but NOT end the turn in the same location.
---- using a direct line movement to where the intended destination was to be ... IP will move the team token. If there are not enough steps available to safely move to the final destination ... he will move it as far as possible and the token's final destination will be the farthest number of steps where it can rest in an unoccupied location. At no time will the token be allowed to move MORE than the number of spaces equal to the number rolled. If when travelling in a straight line to the intended destination there is no UNOCCUPIED safe landing space then the token remains in place and the turn ends.

so as an example ... the team rolls a 6 ...

steps 4 and 5 are occupied but 6 (final destination) is open then the token moves to step 6.

case 2: roll again a 6 ... step 5 and 6 are occupied .. the token can only move 4 safely so it does so and completes the rest of their turn on location 4. At no time would the token advance past the max number of spots for example skip 5 and 6 to land on the next vacant spot which is #7.

case 3: roll is 6 ... 4 and 6 are occupied so the farthest safe landing for the token would be the 5 step so that is where it stops.


I hope I am expressing my thought properly ... I realise in Clue that double occupancy is not allowed ... but with this little adjustment we can all continue without making IP make any decisions or wait for rerouting.


Actually it's in rules, the position is blocked and we cannot pass throught.
But the matter is that in this case, Icepack select HIMSELF where the team should go instead, and that can give more or less possibilities for next round.
BIG PRIZES! CSOP Hold'em
YOU LIKE MONOPOLY? PLAY IT on CC => CONQUEROPOLY
YOU'RE A MEDAL HUNTER? HUNT ALL THE MEDALS YOU NEED HERE!
BIG TRIBE TOURNAMENT VI NATIONS 2018
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DJENRE
 
Posts: 2057
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:59 am
Location: ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby hjelp on Tue Oct 17, 2017 8:01 am

I used to play a kind of dice-games during my childhood.

Assume randomize initiatives;
Dice will be 1 to 6.
Assume dice rolled squares to be moved.
Assume that you have your next square to move in front of you.
Assume you can turn around if an obstacle.

When you are about to move to the next square, it's possible that several adjacent squares are occupied.

Code: Select all
There are four direction if none occupied - move as predicted.
There are three directions if one is occupied - move will be "Left" {1,2}, "Right" {3,4}, Turn around and continue the move {5,6}.
There are two directions if two are occupied - move will be "Left/Right" {1,2,3}, Turn around and continue the move {4,5,6}.
There is one direction if three are occupied - Only one direction allowed.
There is none direction if all are occupied - Stay put - you're locked.


That would add an extra difficulty in the game.
:?:
User avatar
Captain hjelp
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:50 pm

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby LiveLoveTeach on Tue Oct 17, 2017 7:00 pm

t4mcr53s2 wrote:Low and LLT fall will be in feudal ( lower left ) care to join us? i figure you will choose game type as second in


Sounds good, see you there, t4 and FALL. :twisted:
User avatar
Major LiveLoveTeach
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 8:35 am

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby ElricTheGreat on Tue Oct 17, 2017 9:05 pm

I guess you missed the whole point of my post ...

Which is to remove the rule regarding
the position is blocked and we cannot pass through


and replace the movement method to one of my options listed

DJENRE wrote:
ElricTheGreat wrote:sorry guys ... I have not read through all of this .. but I believe the gist of it is that there are times when a team can get blocked because of what might have happened before his turn comes along.

The way I see it is the easiest solution would be to modify the rule regarding not letting 2 teams occupy the same location simultaneously ....

So I would suggest one of these options ...

1 - lift the restriction and allow more than 1 to occupy the same location or pass through to the other side and continue its movement to its final destination.
or
2 - Allow teams pass through an occupied location but NOT end the turn in the same location.
---- using a direct line movement to where the intended destination was to be ... IP will move the team token. If there are not enough steps available to safely move to the final destination ... he will move it as far as possible and the token's final destination will be the farthest number of steps where it can rest in an unoccupied location. At no time will the token be allowed to move MORE than the number of spaces equal to the number rolled. If when travelling in a straight line to the intended destination there is no UNOCCUPIED safe landing space then the token remains in place and the turn ends.

so as an example ... the team rolls a 6 ...

steps 4 and 5 are occupied but 6 (final destination) is open then the token moves to step 6.

case 2: roll again a 6 ... step 5 and 6 are occupied .. the token can only move 4 safely so it does so and completes the rest of their turn on location 4. At no time would the token advance past the max number of spots for example skip 5 and 6 to land on the next vacant spot which is #7.

case 3: roll is 6 ... 4 and 6 are occupied so the farthest safe landing for the token would be the 5 step so that is where it stops.


I hope I am expressing my thought properly ... I realise in Clue that double occupancy is not allowed ... but with this little adjustment we can all continue without making IP make any decisions or wait for rerouting.


Actually it's in rules, the position is blocked and we cannot pass throught.
But the matter is that in this case, Icepack select HIMSELF where the team should go instead, and that can give more or less possibilities for next round.
Image
Stormbringer is thirsty --- Thursting for YOUR Soul!
User avatar
Captain ElricTheGreat
SoC Training Instructor
SoC Training Instructor
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:37 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby DJENRE on Wed Oct 18, 2017 4:02 am

ElricTheGreat wrote:I guess you missed the whole point of my post ...

Which is to remove the rule regarding
the position is blocked and we cannot pass through


and replace the movement method to one of my options listed

DJENRE wrote:
ElricTheGreat wrote:sorry guys ... I have not read through all of this .. but I believe the gist of it is that there are times when a team can get blocked because of what might have happened before his turn comes along.

The way I see it is the easiest solution would be to modify the rule regarding not letting 2 teams occupy the same location simultaneously ....

So I would suggest one of these options ...

1 - lift the restriction and allow more than 1 to occupy the same location or pass through to the other side and continue its movement to its final destination.
or
2 - Allow teams pass through an occupied location but NOT end the turn in the same location.
---- using a direct line movement to where the intended destination was to be ... IP will move the team token. If there are not enough steps available to safely move to the final destination ... he will move it as far as possible and the token's final destination will be the farthest number of steps where it can rest in an unoccupied location. At no time will the token be allowed to move MORE than the number of spaces equal to the number rolled. If when travelling in a straight line to the intended destination there is no UNOCCUPIED safe landing space then the token remains in place and the turn ends.

so as an example ... the team rolls a 6 ...

steps 4 and 5 are occupied but 6 (final destination) is open then the token moves to step 6.

case 2: roll again a 6 ... step 5 and 6 are occupied .. the token can only move 4 safely so it does so and completes the rest of their turn on location 4. At no time would the token advance past the max number of spots for example skip 5 and 6 to land on the next vacant spot which is #7.

case 3: roll is 6 ... 4 and 6 are occupied so the farthest safe landing for the token would be the 5 step so that is where it stops.


I hope I am expressing my thought properly ... I realise in Clue that double occupancy is not allowed ... but with this little adjustment we can all continue without making IP make any decisions or wait for rerouting.


Actually it's in rules, the position is blocked and we cannot pass throught.
But the matter is that in this case, Icepack select HIMSELF where the team should go instead, and that can give more or less possibilities for next round.

Yes I perfectly see what you said.
But we're not asking for changing the rules, we pointed out a problem which is NOT in any rules.
See the problem and try to apply your new rule, it won't help. :D
Icepack had two possibilities for us and choose one instead the other.
BIG PRIZES! CSOP Hold'em
YOU LIKE MONOPOLY? PLAY IT on CC => CONQUEROPOLY
YOU'RE A MEDAL HUNTER? HUNT ALL THE MEDALS YOU NEED HERE!
BIG TRIBE TOURNAMENT VI NATIONS 2018
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DJENRE
 
Posts: 2057
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:59 am
Location: ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby IcePack on Wed Oct 18, 2017 7:33 pm

I sent a PM to two clans that haven't submitted their turns. I assume it has to do with the ongoing discussions etc.
For now, Turn 5 started before the discussions so we will play this per normal. I've given them until Thursday @ 2400 CCT to submit for Turn 5.

I'll send out new info with the Turn 6 rolls, if any.

Thanks,
IcePack
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
User avatar
Major IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16524
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Tuesday]

Postby DJENRE on Wed Oct 18, 2017 7:55 pm

IcePack wrote:I sent a PM to two clans that haven't submitted their turns. I assume it has to do with the ongoing discussions etc.
For now, Turn 5 started before the discussions so we will play this per normal. I've given them until Thursday @ 2400 CCT to submit for Turn 5.
I'll send out new info with the Turn 6 rolls, if any.
Thanks,
IcePack

Well I understand our demand about turn 5 has not been received favorably.
:arrow: Then we move to H20.
BIG PRIZES! CSOP Hold'em
YOU LIKE MONOPOLY? PLAY IT on CC => CONQUEROPOLY
YOU'RE A MEDAL HUNTER? HUNT ALL THE MEDALS YOU NEED HERE!
BIG TRIBE TOURNAMENT VI NATIONS 2018
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DJENRE
 
Posts: 2057
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:59 am
Location: ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Thursday]

Postby ElricTheGreat on Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:53 pm

Yes I perfectly see what you said.
But we're not asking for changing the rules, we pointed out a problem which is NOT in any rules.
See the problem and try to apply your new rule, it won't help. :D
Icepack had two possibilities for us and choose one instead the other.


Actually my solution DOES cover it ... there is no longer any need for IP to decide anything .... you move part way to your destination, all the way, or not at all!

No 2nd choice ... you pick the destination and the rest just happens
Image
Stormbringer is thirsty --- Thursting for YOUR Soul!
User avatar
Captain ElricTheGreat
SoC Training Instructor
SoC Training Instructor
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:37 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Conquer Clue: [Turn 5 Thursday]

Postby ElricTheGreat on Thu Oct 19, 2017 1:08 am

Foed is looking for a team interested in going back and forth between FE and Arms Race to get all the clues we can

Who is interested
Image
Stormbringer is thirsty --- Thursting for YOUR Soul!
User avatar
Captain ElricTheGreat
SoC Training Instructor
SoC Training Instructor
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:37 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Conquer Clue Turn 6 Due Saturday @ 2400 CCT

Postby IcePack on Thu Oct 19, 2017 9:45 pm

Updated
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
User avatar
Major IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16524
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Re: Conquer Clue Turn 6 Due Saturday @ 2400 CCT

Postby t4mcr53s2 on Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:27 pm

foed, low either of you interested in a tussle at arms race? for turn 6?
I wish either my father or my mother, or indeed both of them as they were in duty both equally bound to it, had minded what they were about when....

If 2 player fog game,please allow 12 hour snap courtesy, or post what I could have seen.... Thank you
User avatar
Colonel t4mcr53s2
 
Posts: 874
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:19 pm
Location: maryland, usa
22

PreviousNext

Return to Clan Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users