Conquer Club

patrickaa317 wrote:TFFS has 3 people who've predicted. If every clan got this many, we'd be at 60 in no time.

kizkiz wrote:Any idea when we are going to get privs for this?
I'm off all week, so would be handy to be able to create the games ready for inviting on the day

Genoke wrote:

patrickaa317 wrote:TFFS has 3 people who've predicted. If every clan got this many, we'd be at 60 in no time.

32 at the moment
2 from atlantis

dt03457 wrote:dt03457 and Umbrellaman need game creation privileges fo 1 vs 1.

Thx

IcePack wrote:Matches can be negotiated, yes. As an organizer I would appreciate keeping round limits if it is. However, if it isn't used then it will be allowed unless it seems to be holding up the event. If it appears to be holding the event up, then it'll get changed to a "no". The intent of this event is to be rather quick.

I know there's the opinion out there, and for other events I would definitely consider it. For this one, my preference is no trench. If its individually negotiated, then I would watch carefully to make sure its not holding up other wars (IE, everyone is completed except a war that used trench).

IcePack

kizkiz wrote:

IcePack wrote:Matches can be negotiated, yes. As an organizer I would appreciate keeping round limits if it is. However, if it isn't used then it will be allowed unless it seems to be holding up the event. If it appears to be holding the event up, then it'll get changed to a "no". The intent of this event is to be rather quick.

I know there's the opinion out there, and for other events I would definitely consider it. For this one, my preference is no trench. If its individually negotiated, then I would watch carefully to make sure its not holding up other wars (IE, everyone is completed except a war that used trench).

IcePack

I meant to do this ages ago, but only just remembered.
I've played 124 trench matches 1vs1.
3 have gone beyond 20 rounds.
1 of those was das schloss, and 1 was my opponent effectively holding me hostage for about 10 turns due to no knowledge of the map until i told him how to win the game
none have gone beyond 30 rounds

In our first round tie in this comp my trench matches were the first to finish, not going beyond round 9 in any

Only posting this to show you that it's not something to worry about in future. Too many people have misconceptions about trench

kizkiz wrote:

IcePack wrote:Matches can be negotiated, yes. As an organizer I would appreciate keeping round limits if it is. However, if it isn't used then it will be allowed unless it seems to be holding up the event. If it appears to be holding the event up, then it'll get changed to a "no". The intent of this event is to be rather quick.

I know there's the opinion out there, and for other events I would definitely consider it. For this one, my preference is no trench. If its individually negotiated, then I would watch carefully to make sure its not holding up other wars (IE, everyone is completed except a war that used trench).

IcePack

I meant to do this ages ago, but only just remembered.
I've played 124 trench matches 1vs1.
3 have gone beyond 20 rounds.
1 of those was das schloss, and 1 was my opponent effectively holding me hostage for about 10 turns due to no knowledge of the map until i told him how to win the game
none have gone beyond 30 rounds

In our first round tie in this comp my trench matches were the first to finish, not going beyond round 9 in any

Only posting this to show you that it's not something to worry about in future. Too many people have misconceptions about trench

scottp wrote:can we do Unlimited forts on the Trench Warfare map? It's more of a "separated start" than is Arms Race!, which is on that list...

Armandolas wrote:Hello Icepack, maybe im missing something, but it would be nice to see the bracket in OP
Cheers