Conquer Club

Posted: **Wed Jan 10, 2018 4:37 am**

___________

_____________

__________

_Royal Galactic Vengeance_______________________ FIRE and DICE
.

War Link

Contacts:
RGV: Domination_44
FaD: Razorvich

Battle Rules:

show: Battle rules

Schedule:

show: Schedule

The Games:

show: Round 1

show: Round 2

Posted: **Wed Jan 10, 2018 5:32 am**

Llama !! ..... I'm calling you out for a Signature Bet

IF.. your RGV are victorious, I will guarantee to wear ANY LEGAL signature of your choice for 30 days.

BUT.. IF FaD triumph YOU WEAR WHAT I GIVE YOU for 30 days.
(Be aware there may be a public event for entries, and I will extend that to my signature if required)

DEAL?

Takes more than 1 downstairs to post a challenge like this 8-)

How many do you have? :-s

On a personal note....
Suck it up Clan Mods.. you got another FaD Clan War thread to deal with BHAHAHHAHAHAHA<--(me laughing)... AND... whats even better, I made all you suckers look at this rambling sentence DOTDOTCOMMACOMMADOT.... BHAHAHHAHAHAHA<--(me laughing again) :twisted:

Posted: **Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:58 am**

10 camo easter eggs says he won't do it

Posted: **Wed Jan 10, 2018 10:24 am**

nope.

Posted: **Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:31 pm**

Looks good

Posted: **Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:33 pm**

riskllama wrote:nope.

Posted: **Sat Jan 20, 2018 7:23 am**

Its Ok llama to be scared of what i would come up with... totally understandable considering Catchers last FAIL..... I withdraw my challenge without prejudice.

HANG ON A MINUTE... WHAT IS THIS I SEE??? :twisted:

Wasn't there before......A NEW under-the-radar Recruit???

Llama !! PunkRocker ..... I'm calling you out for a Signature Bet

IF.. your RGV are victorious, I will guarantee to wear ANY LEGAL signature of your choice for 30 days.

BUT.. IF FaD triumph YOU WEAR WHAT I GIVE YOU for 30 days.
(Be aware there may be a public event for entries, and I will extend that to my signature if required)

DEAL?

Surely there is someone in your clan that isn't a pussy?.. you gutless like Llama, Punky?

DO YOU FEEL LUCKY PUNKY?

BHAHAHAHA this just got 1000% better

OH yeah.. RGV Round 1 games are active, page updated.

Posted: **Sun Jan 21, 2018 2:22 pm**

Great News !!! =D>

Pilager has volunteered to accept your challenge, raz!!!
=D>

Posted: **Mon Jan 22, 2018 9:33 am**

don't be a pussy llama, Raz will think you're weak.

this RGV clan is weak.

Posted: **Tue Jan 23, 2018 5:40 pm**

raz is currently being punished for dodging me on a chat related disciplinary issue. so yeah - not playing along. and what's more, you can all SUCK IT.
*drops mic*

Posted: **Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:42 am**

2nd blood RGVGame 17997248
WELL DONE SA (and team)

Posted: **Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:29 pm**

missed classic my first go

Hey mates:

Wonder if we can get some revised results in this thread? Here is my read, rough calculations,on our home games, so please check my math. ( as well as my coding)

Few

Round 1]RGV Home Games: - 5 Quads, 10 Trips, 5 Dubs (20 Jan)
RGV 8 v FaD 6
Quads:
Game 17997257 - Africa RGV
Game 17997248 - Antarctica RGV
Game 17997242 - Conquer 500 RGV
Game 17997216 - First Nations
Game 17997146 - Conquer Rome

Trips:
Game 17997223 - Australia RGV
Game 17997239 - Pearl Harbor
Game 17997231 - Woodboro
Game 17997226 - Brazil FaD
Game 17997207 - Fractured China FaD
Game 17997154 - Iberia FaD
Game 17997153 - British Isles RGV
Game 17997132 - Canada
Game 17997122 - Montreal FaD
Game 17997118 - Halloween Hollows FaD

Dubs:
Game 17997279 - North America RGV
Game 17997265 - Peloponnesian War
Game 17997262 - Feudal War FaD
Game 17997211 - Classic RGV
Game 17997115 - South Africa 1885 RGV

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:39 pm**

FaD created an extra home triples game instead of creating a tiebreaker game. So it's safe to assume one of their trips home games will instead be the tiebreaker match in round 2?? Razor hasn't replied to my pm offering that yet.

Also- Game 18014618 isnt showing up https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... WarId=2964

I'm assuming it's due to the extra game?

D44

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:34 pm**

One of my many pet peeves is the automatic standard inclusion of a "tiebreaker" in clan wars. Tie breakers are only be relevant if there is a tie. In this war, at a certain level it doesn't matter what game you call a tiebreaker. In this war IF and only IF, with 80 games completed there's a tie- RGV 40 FaD 40, - could we then call the 81st game completed a tie breaker. And it wouldn;t matter what game it is, its the last game completed. But if say with 80 games completed one clan has a lead , be it 41 v 39 or 79 v 1, the results of the 81st game makes no difference

Domination_44 wrote:FaD created an extra home triples game instead of creating a tiebreaker game. So it's safe to assume one of their trips home games will instead be the tiebreaker match in round 2?? Razor hasn't replied to my pm offering that yet.

Also- Game 18014618 isnt showing up https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... WarId=2964

I'm assuming it's due to the extra game?

D44

Posted: **Fri Feb 23, 2018 7:32 am**

Sorry everyone.. I have been distracted, will get on top of things this weekend

Posted: **Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:26 pm**

*yawns*

Posted: **Sat Mar 03, 2018 11:40 pm**

As I read it from
https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... WarId=2964

its currently RGV 21 v FaD 19 .

I know things can go crazy but this would be a good time as Round 1 ends,with RGV clearly winning that round, to do an update - and please change the title of this thread.

FAKE NEWS!!! RGV (12) Vs FaD (13)

Posted: **Sun Mar 04, 2018 8:52 am**

Fewnix wrote:As I read it from
https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... WarId=2964

its currently RGV 21 v FaD 19 .

I know things can go crazy but this would be a good time as Round 1 ends,with RGV clearly winning that round, to do an update - and please change the title of this thread.

FAKE NEWS!!! RGV (12) Vs FaD (13)

will do tomorrow

Posted: **Sun Mar 04, 2018 4:10 pm**

Fewnix wrote:One of my many pet peeves is the automatic standard inclusion of a "tiebreaker" in clan wars. Tie breakers are only be relevant if there is a tie. In this war, at a certain level it doesn't matter what game you call a tiebreaker. In this war IF and only IF, with 80 games completed there's a tie- RGV 40 FaD 40, - could we then call the 81st game completed a tie breaker. And it wouldn;t matter what game it is, its the last game completed. But if say with 80 games completed one clan has a lead , be it 41 v 39 or 79 v 1, the results of the 81st game makes no difference

Domination_44 wrote:FaD created an extra home triples game instead of creating a tiebreaker game. So it's safe to assume one of their trips home games will instead be the tiebreaker match in round 2?? Razor hasn't replied to my pm offering that yet.

Also- Game 18014618 isnt showing up https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... WarId=2964

I'm assuming it's due to the extra game?

D44

Tie breaker does matter, as its part of the war priv's requirements. As per the war agreement, its NOT the last game completed. Its supposed to be exchanged in Round 1.

I've received a PM regarding incorrect games in the war, and have included both Razorvich and Domination_44 in the pm. Please be sure to meet all agreed upon war requirements during the commencement of the war(s), otherwise issues can arise. Hopefully, we can address the problem via PM and move on.

Thanks
IcePack

Posted: **Sat Mar 10, 2018 10:24 am**

Round 1 is over and as I read it, RGV won 21 v FaD 19. Close.

RGV won most of its 20 Home games RGV 13 v FaD 7
and lost most of its Away Games, FaDs' Home games RGV 8 v FaD 12

Sound right? A math check and update appreciated. :-s

Posted: **Fri Mar 30, 2018 11:07 pm**

I know things get crazy but, as well as updating this discussion (RGV 12 v FaD 13, really???) we need to update
https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... WarId=2964

It currently has the score RGV 40 v FaD 33 with only 6 active games left in the war = 78 games when there should be 81 games in this

Game 18126186 Feudal Epic seems to be lacking a FaD? which is why it is not active
Game 18126197 Nap Europe we, RGV won don't show up in the win column,

and, not that we will need it, looks like RGV 41 FaD 39, a tie-breaker may be missing.

Posted: **Thu Apr 05, 2018 1:21 am**

Wow! What a really close war! Yes, I also hope for a thread update soon. It would make it easier for us spectators to follow

Posted: **Sun Apr 08, 2018 5:16 am**

Yep.. looks like a Royal Galactic Vengeance win

should have taken that bet Llama

Posted: **Tue Apr 10, 2018 1:48 am**

Conquer Club

RGV (43) vs FaD (38) - RGV Wins! - Final 4/22/18

RGV (43) vs FaD (38) - RGV Wins! - Final 4/22/18

Re: RGV Vs FaD (Starting Jan 20)

Re: RGV Vs FaD (Starting Jan 20)

Re: RGV Vs FaD (Starting Jan 20)

Re: RGV Vs FaD (Starting Jan 20)

Re: RGV Vs FaD (Starting Jan 20)

Re: RGV Vs FaD (Starting Jan 20)

Re: RGV Vs FaD (Starting Jan 20)

Re: RGV Vs FaD (Starting Jan 20)

Re: RGV Vs FaD (Starting Jan 20)

Re: RGV (0) Vs FaD (1)

Re: RGV (0) Vs FaD (1)- revision revised

Re: RGV (0) Vs FaD (1)

Re: RGV (0) Vs FaD (1)

Re: RGV (12) Vs FaD (13)

Re: RGV (12) Vs FaD (13)

Re: RGV (12) Vs FaD (13)

Re: RGV (12) Vs FaD (13)

Re: RGV (0) Vs FaD (1)

Re: RGV (12) Vs FaD (13)

Re: RGV (12) Vs FaD (13)

Re: RGV (12) Vs FaD (13)

Re: RGV (41) Vs FaD (35)

Re: RGV (41) Vs FaD (35)