Conquer Club

iAmCaffeine wrote:

IcePack wrote:I'm suggesting that maybe you are interpreting "the most improved" differently then the site does. Because clearly by the calculations, the ones who are winning are being deemed by the site as "most improved" if they are not being found abusive of the system in C&A. Seems pretty logical, but you're just trying to redefine "most improved".

I'm glad you know about your members getting their medals. My point was did you look up how they did it? But again, I also said I really didn't care, only that if you cared enough about your list you might want to look into it. But again, I really dont care about what you do or your list.

Yes, I've looked into it. I figured you'd realise that if you read between the lines.

Some people have been found to abuse the system in C&A, such as xroads. Others didn't because they were more careful and tactful in how they abused the system. I'm not trying to re-define anything. How do you even re-define the words "most improved"? How do you make an argument that someone who deliberately dropped to private from major, and then wins the medal by going back up to major, is the most improved? They didn't get better at all, they just temporarily made themselves worse.

IcePack wrote:

I never said your clan did something so to respond as "you saying something we did which we didn't" doesn't make sense at all

Really?

There was definitely a player from FALL

Seems like you identified our "clan" (or a member thereof) as someone who did it. If you were identifying players who abused it and had nothing to do with clans, then why would you bring up the clan in your statement? Nice twisting what you said and trying to make it about me tho, I agree it is pretty silly.

I really dont care about you one way or the other, but its cute that you think it frustrates me and you have that big of an impact on my day

Yes, a player from FALL. I couldn't remember their name but believed they were in FALL, so that was what I referenced. Lmao. Grasp more.

iAmCaffeine wrote:They haven't improved though, their score has during that time. They have not.

The biggest Score Movers for the month of Sep 2017. See here for our Prizes.

iAmCaffeine wrote:So you think it's perfectly acceptable for players to deliberately tank their points at the end of one month to then increase it the next for the prizes? Bearing in mind we know that most of these players have either (1) deadbeated, (2) intentionally missed turns or (3) played games they know they will lose points on.

That sounds like a great outlook from one of the more prominent Team CC members.

They are, after all, the type of player the scoreboard was designed for.

Are you suggesting that the Most Improved Scoreboard was not, in fact, designed for those players who have improved most over the course of the month

They haven't improved though, their score has during that time. They have not.

iAmCaffeine wrote:

IcePack wrote:IDC about ATN, as I said do what you like with that info (or dont). I didn't say clear their names, I said if you wanted to look at how they got those medals and whether or not they abused it was up to you. Your the one making the stupid list for petes sake.

IcePack wrote:If you are so concerned about these medals, maybe you should look up your own clan mates and clear their name.

I wanted to post this part again because it's funny.

iAmCaffeine wrote:

iAmCaffeine wrote:

IcePack wrote:IDC about ATN, as I said do what you like with that info (or dont). I didn't say clear their names, I said if you wanted to look at how they got those medals and whether or not they abused it was up to you. Your the one making the stupid list for petes sake.

IcePack wrote:If you are so concerned about these medals, maybe you should look up your own clan mates and clear their name.

I wanted to post this part again because it's funny.

iAmCaffeine wrote:C&A results have gone both ways depending on how tactful the abuser has been. However you cover it up though, it's still abuse.

Nice of you to add in "medal hunting for a few months" which is not what we're discussing here. Why even add in "a few months"? Ah, because you knew it was the only way to use it as part of your argument. Just a tip, but it's better to leave comments like that behind if you have to tailor them to suit what you want to say.

So, from your words, we are to believe that bigWham created this scoreboard for the intention of whoever could increase their score the most that month in whatever method possible that didn't directly break any rules - since gross abuse of the game is too ambiguous - and it wasn't a way to award players who were genuinely making improvements as a whole? Do you actually believe that?

Even so I gotta say, your posts here just to disagree with me even though you agree with me on principal are mildly entertaining.

IcePack wrote:

iAmCaffeine wrote:

iAmCaffeine wrote:

IcePack wrote:IDC about ATN, as I said do what you like with that info (or dont). I didn't say clear their names, I said if you wanted to look at how they got those medals and whether or not they abused it was up to you. Your the one making the stupid list for petes sake.

IcePack wrote:If you are so concerned about these medals, maybe you should look up your own clan mates and clear their name.

I wanted to post this part again because it's funny.

Gotta repeat the only thing you got right to make yourself feel better over and over and over?

IcePack wrote:

iAmCaffeine wrote:C&A results have gone both ways depending on how tactful the abuser has been. However you cover it up though, it's still abuse.

Nice of you to add in "medal hunting for a few months" which is not what we're discussing here. Why even add in "a few months"? Ah, because you knew it was the only way to use it as part of your argument. Just a tip, but it's better to leave comments like that behind if you have to tailor them to suit what you want to say.

So, from your words, we are to believe that bigWham created this scoreboard for the intention of whoever could increase their score the most that month in whatever method possible that didn't directly break any rules - since gross abuse of the game is too ambiguous - and it wasn't a way to award players who were genuinely making improvements as a whole? Do you actually believe that?

Even so I gotta say, your posts here just to disagree with me even though you agree with me on principal are mildly entertaining.

I'm sorry, you made the leap from me explaining how the monthly system works to somehow supporting abuse previously. I thought you might to be walked thru with an explaination
You used the words "tanked" I'm giving an example of a way that someone might "tank" their score. How is that not what we are discussing? Holy jeez man youre all over the fucking map here. A few months, a month, whatever its just an example dude. One of many. I'm sure you can probably think of some more, you aren't that dense are you?
Do I believe what I've said, is literally what the site description says, and what people have done, and has been deemed ok by C&A (outside of extreme cases)? Yes, yes i do. Since you know, thats what was discussed, beta tested, and literally WRITTEN ON THE DESCRIPTION OF THE FEATURE. Holy f*ck man...seriously? Really? Come on...

jammyjames wrote:Well i'll be damned, looks like things haven't changed much around here then!

t4mcr53s2 wrote:how is power score calculated , anyway? just curious and I agree its tacky ...

Donelladan wrote:As far as I know the exact formula isn't known.

But many high ranked players won this one, starting high and finishing higher.