Conquer Club

https://www.conquerclub.com/player.php? ... t_id=12155

How this still can exist? 20 y of CC?
Realy?
Winner path;
Round 1 - 7-0 eliminated dont play
Round 2 - 3-4 eliminated acctualy win the round
Round 3 - 5-2 clear victory
Round 4 - 7-0 clear victory
Round 5 - 2-5 clear defeat

And that is a winner of tournament?

big shame for CC.
I hope somebody will change this because this is literally shit

You’re mad cuz you got beat?

IcePack wrote:You’re mad cuz you got beat?

Hah,realy I am fine ,thank you for taking care.
I understand rules are now like how it is.
I just want better CC.
And I dont understand how you guys still let this settings possible.
Isnt possible mix Apples and Pears(league and tree settings)
Or is possible? Lol now I see it is.
But how this looks?
Looks like some Amateur first time make Tournament .
OFC I dont want offend anybody,just like I say...I want better CC

If I'm understanding correctly, the complaint is that the player with the worse record won the tournament due to the tiebreaker rules.

But that's life. It isn't just CC. In every game and sport, there are situations where a weak team wins because they were lucky enough to land in the right division or whatever. That's just the nature of games and tournaments. Sometimes things just stack up in your favour.

Dukasaur wrote:If I'm understanding correctly, the complaint is that the player with the worse record won the tournament due to the tiebreaker rules.

But that's life. It isn't just CC. In every game and sport, there are situations where a weak team wins because they were lucky enough to land in the right division or whatever. That's just the nature of games and tournaments. Sometimes things just stack up in your favour.

Tell me one more sport or game with this Tournament settings.

I say also that I dont complain anything about Winner,he just play and win( he also dont know he will win )

I want to show you that it is impossible to have a mixed league and cup system competition in one tournament like this one.
Do you understand me?
If it is played 1 on 1 throughout the tournament, if it is eliminated after each round.
Then it can only be a cup system, which means that the only possible setting is Winner of Round advance to next Round.

I just want make this site better nothing else.

I kind of have to agree with nema here. This tournament setting puts enormous pressure on the luck of which opponent you draw early.

Zipper drew the corporal NCalchuo in round 1. NCalchuo never showed up, so Zipper was credited with a 7-0 win.
ReDBuLLs drew the lieutenant Larry46, playing a tight round, which he won 4-3.

Then in the second round, Zipper and ReDBuLLs were paired. To continue to round 3, you needed at least 9 wins, plus luck with tiebreakers. Because he drew a no show, Zipper could afford to lose 4-3 and proceed, or even 5-2 with lucky tiebreakers. ReDBuLLs had drawn an equal opponent in round 1, which means he needed to win at least 5-2 to have a chance at proceeding. The eventual result of 4-3 to ReDBuLLs meant that Zipper continued on, whereas ReDBuLLs was eliminated.

Theoretically, it's possible that the two finalists enter the final round with an insurmountable deficit for a player (28 vs 20 wins means that the player with 20 wins can't win the tournament).

This is the announced tournament format, so in that sense it's fair, but I have to agree that it doesn't feel like a good tournament format. If you're counting game wins, a round robin format where everyone plays the same opponents would make far more sense.

I thought it was a tournament running by a member, but it was not.
So: +1 for nema

This isn't literally shit, it's literally a cumulative score with no resets between rounds.
You entered a contest without understanding the rules and have complained that you did not win when the advertised rules were implemented.

I agree that this format is flawed. At minimum, score should reset once the final round begins.