Moderator: Community Team
s.xkitten wrote:sometimes, if i have a lot of troops on one place, i offer to...and then some other person will freak out, "omg, they have an allience" bs like that..when all you want to do is move your troops...i think its stupid to freak out when they offer once to let you get them out of the way, or you offer to move them so that you don't lose troops
Bishop wrote:I thought this was just common sense. Has anyone ever read The Art of War by Sun Tzu? Pointless fighting has to be avoided at all costs.
Does anyone ever use the flip side of this? I mean, using a third party as a defensive buffer between you and an enemy. For example, if I'm in South America and there's ten armies in North Africa, I know that anyone attacking me is going to have around ten less people by the time they get to me.
Since it works both ways, it's pointless to get angry about it.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
KoolBak wrote:Well considering who asked the question, I feel the need to reply.....
I have done it once and it happened to be in a game with the redman himself.....he gave me grief about making a pseudo allaince and I felt like hell.
It meant alot to me at the time...."Hey you...move aside and I'll get outta yer way...."......
I still feel shitty about it given my No Alliance harcore stance and I have never done it since.
I think given the right circumstances it is not uncool but I have never done it again.
Frikken Indians....LOL!!!!
Qeeeester, do I hear a reply?
RobinJ wrote:Nah... I like the idea of alliances. They add another dimension to the game. But i do remember one game on the middle Earth map where I was playing with a noob. I had to pile all my armies into one place to stop the noob from annihilating me. Meanwhile, the 3rd player sat back and then won the game after we had destroyed eachother...
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users