samgrossy wrote:Lastly, Chuck has yet to provide any solid evidence that I could be scum, and a name doesn't cut it. So, I hope that we can say that chuck is acting really scummy.
ShaggyDan wrote:I agree with your point about Chuck. I would very much like him to explain his evidence for voting you, because at the moment he has given no reason at all except that he knows your name.
uhhh... I did explain my vote:
from Day 3:
thechuck51 wrote:I'm not missing.samgrossy wrote:I am not sure if this is going to get anywhere, but there have been alot of people on the "inactive" side of this. Which either means they can't talk, or aren't playing along. For example, I know that Chuck voted me D1, and has said a peep since.
I find this statement rather odd. To me it implies some sort of inside info that only scum would know. vote samgrossy
from earlier today:
thechuck51 wrote:Well I was given these names as a result of my inspections and as I got each one I searched the Halo Wiki and got the same stuff you found, none of which I found useful. And to be honest role name's do not appear to be a good way to determine mafia or town but It is not samgrossy's role name that tell me he is scum.
Think about how people respond in game when players are inactive. Usually people ask where he/she is and if the mod can prod or replace them for inactivity. How many times do people assume right away that they are prevented from posting? If you can honestly say that it happens often then go ahead and vote me but to me it shows that he knows something the rest of us (at least the rest of the town) don't.
