Page 11 of 28

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:54 am
by Ragian
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Several things are wrong with what you just posted, Mitch. What's going on, then?

@Mandy, does your claiming involve incriminating evidence against Thor?

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:53 am
by mandalorian2298
Ragian wrote::lol: :lol: :lol:

Several things are wrong with what you just posted, Mitch. What's going on, then?

@Mandy, does your claiming involve incriminating evidence against Thor?


No. I accused Thor based on a pure and simple read as I explained in the post where I voted him.

Also, I didn't claim, I just made fun of his logic and syntax,

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:13 pm
by Ragian
I got that you never claimed. Thoughts on mitch, Mandy?

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:16 pm
by Thorthoth
Pikanchion wrote:Them is a singular indefinite pronoun as well as a plural.

Uh, No. It's not.
Ragian wrote:Well, yes, when the semantics of the preceeding is plural, albeit grammatically singular, such as, "Nobody likes leaving their bags unattended,''...
.
Even that is incorrect. The noun 'nobody' is singular. It should read, "Nobody likes leaving his bags unattended.'' or id the subject is known to be female, "Nobody likes leaving her bags unattended.'' The pronouns, he, him, his, etc. are used for persons of unknown gender. In that case, there is no assumption of maleness.
But, I digress...
mandalorian2298 wrote:No. I accused Thor based on a pure and simple read as I explained in the post where I voted him.

Mandy, it's very scummy of you to not explain clearly and provide a quote. Of course, you didn't have a good reason, you just pulled this lynch wagon against me out of your ass.
I'll find the quote and post it myself. Read below.

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:19 pm
by Thorthoth
mandalorian2298 wrote:
Thorthoth wrote:Hmm?
Well, luckily, DDS wasn't a big queen... at least not in this game anyway ;) .

I'm actually much more interested in what the hell happened with Pika yesterday?

PIka, are you still around in a form that can communicate with us?
If so, what is your explanation for your amazing lynch dodge?
(A truthful explanation, might be nice...)


Pika, I think I'll ignore your Rag-hounding for a bit, because this post set of my scummy sense.

First, there is an overt shade towards dakky (with his boobie theory), subtly implying that DDS was killed by someone who believed him to be Queen.

Then there is the use of "actually" which to me looks like a needles underscoring of the following being truth, which in turn is a common tell for lying. This is compunded by italicized "truthful" in the next sentence.

Add to that the fact that the question is completely meaningless since Pika has just been proven to be the Unlynchable Townie (since an unlynchable scum, if such a thing exists, would certainly be OPed in a nine player game), and I sense nervousness of a scumster trying to appear active.

vote Thorthoth

This is mandy's malarkey lynch rationale. It seems that words like 'actually' and 'truthful' trigger him. Oh yeah, he really has a case.

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:31 pm
by Ragian
Saying something is "wrong" in terms of language is inherently flawed if utilised by a lot of people. That's how language develops. While we're waiting for Flores (and possibly a VC), you are welcome to enjoy this.

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:46 pm
by Thorthoth
Ragian wrote:Saying something is "wrong" in terms of language is inherently flawed if utilised by a lot of people. That's how language develops. While we're waiting for Flores (and possibly a VC), you are welcome to enjoy this.

The so-called 'male' pronouns also have standard, non gender-specific usage definitions that have been recognized for centuries.
Now we have people who use 'they' when they* mean a single person. Of course, all sorts of confusion ensues, as you've already demonstrated.
However, I agree, Now that people often converse and meet on-line with little possibility of face-to-face contact, there is often no need to specify gender. I just use 'he' for everybody, unless it's become very clear that 'she' should be used. In this game, skoffin is the only 'she' I know about, though there may be others.

* People is a plural-usage noun, so it's fine.

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 12:21 am
by Ragian
I prefer using people's names if it's unclear. Oh well... As long as no one is hurt.

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 1 - 9/9 alive]

PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 12:54 am
by BuJaber

Vote Count:

Ragian (2) - dakky21, madmitch
Thorthoth (2) - mandalorian2298, Pikanchion
mandalorian2298 (1) - Thorthoth


There is currently no deadline.
With 8 alive it takes 5 to lynch.

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 12:57 am
by Ragian
Thanks, BuJ. Any news about Flores? Should we be looking for a sub?

What happened to Skoffin? All the girls silenced?

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 1:06 am
by Skoffin
I suddenly went from having no jobs to now having two jobs; I am rekt.

Semantics over language is to FJDHSGEU for me. Although I don't care what pronouns people use for me online, hence why I don't bother correcting people that use 'he' for me.

Still don't get the ragoo/pika thing. Mandy, if you believe that Pika must be town because he is unlynchable then you must believe he is telling the truth about ragian; so why are you not voting ragoo?

Mitch is scum. Dakky or mandy is also scum. I nap now thx.

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 2:08 am
by Ragian
If you're so friggin' adamant that Mitch is scum, why aren't you voting him? I tend to agree with you right now. I don't see why dakky or Mandy MUST be scum. If there's evidence that either of the MUST be scum, it would be dakky.

Semantics was passtime.

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 4:08 am
by Skoffin
Because I do what I want.

Mandy contradicted himself and I want answers.

I'll fight you all.

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 7:59 am
by Ragian
Mandy probably put his blinders on. It happens. Tell me about mitch, woman! You can do it in a fight if you so wish.

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 3:58 am
by mandalorian2298
@Ragian At this moment Mitch is an impenetratable mystery to me, as usual, since he went back to writing in Mitchian runes.

Skoffin wrote:I suddenly went from having no jobs to now having two jobs; I am rekt.

Semantics over language is to FJDHSGEU for me. Although I don't care what pronouns people use for me online, hence why I don't bother correcting people that use 'he' for me.

Still don't get the ragoo/pika thing. Mandy, if you believe that Pika must be town because he is unlynchable then you must believe he is telling the truth about ragian; so why are you not voting ragoo?

Mitch is scum. Dakky or mandy is also scum. I nap now thx.


He "knows" that Ragian is scum just like I knew that you were Scar. In other words he really, really believes it. If he had proof, he would have posted it. Just because I believe his alligment doesn't necessarily mean that trust his reasoning above my own and mine tells me that Thorth is the scummiest in all the land.

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 4:00 am
by Ragian
Could we replace Flores, please?

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive] [Looking for replacemen

PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 4:50 am
by BuJaber
If we get a replacement sure. She may come back in the meantime.

Is wing still around?

I discussed the setup with 2 players who didn't join so they can't sub and LoVo can only sub for Thor because of the mistiming earlier.

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive] [Looking for replacemen

PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 5:54 am
by madmitch
come on guys lets get on the same band wave , who is the biggest scum RAGS or THORTH ? .WE NEED TO CHOSE ONE

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive] [Looking for replacemen

PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:48 am
by Ragian
You're right. Vote mitch

Your posts are the most scummy so far. You have refrained from answering questions, you have attributed stances to people, and you seem awfully confident that whoever of the two you mention just now are not on your team. I reckon you're scum. And I don't think Thor is your scumbuddy.

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive] [Looking for replacemen

PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:42 am
by madmitch
OKAY now we know :D How many more people would you like to vote for Rags? Pika was right,sorry should have listened earlier, so come on guys RAGS IS SCUM lets take him out.

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive] [Looking for replacemen

PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 1:32 pm
by Ragian
Spoil us with an argument, Mitchie :)

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive] [Looking for replacemen

PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:48 pm
by madmitch
no argument needed the King has spoken (Pika ) should have listened

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive] [Looking for replacemen

PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 3:16 pm
by Ragian
Thank you very much. It shouldn't be too difficult for others to decide now.

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 4:42 pm
by Skoffin
Ragian wrote:Mandy probably put his blinders on. It happens. Tell me about mitch, woman! You can do it in a fight if you so wish.

I've been so tired and overworked that I forgot the differences between this game and Cyoc wololol. I have valid reasons, I just don't remember exactly what they were.
His overall demeanour screams scum; he gets both defensive and aggressive, gets cranky, seems slightly more determined than what he is doing when town etc.

Mitch is still scum.
Vote mitch

Re: Chess Mafia [Day 2 - 8/9 alive]

PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 4:48 pm
by Skoffin
mandalorian2298 wrote:@Ragian At this moment Mitch is an impenetratable mystery to me, as usual, since he went back to writing in Mitchian runes.

Skoffin wrote:I suddenly went from having no jobs to now having two jobs; I am rekt.

Semantics over language is to FJDHSGEU for me. Although I don't care what pronouns people use for me online, hence why I don't bother correcting people that use 'he' for me.

Still don't get the ragoo/pika thing. Mandy, if you believe that Pika must be town because he is unlynchable then you must believe he is telling the truth about ragian; so why are you not voting ragoo?

Mitch is scum. Dakky or mandy is also scum. I nap now thx.


He "knows" that Ragian is scum just like I knew that you were Scar. In other words he really, really believes it. If he had proof, he would have posted it. Just because I believe his alligment doesn't necessarily mean that trust his reasoning above my own and mine tells me that Thorth is the scummiest in all the land.


But he claims he has info due to his role that TELLS him about Ragian - are you suggesting that Pika is outright lying about that part? and if so why?