Dukasaur wrote:I'm having plenty of fun playing this challenge. When my turn comes up, I play it, I have fun. Sometimes I win, sometimes I lose. If I win, it happens on my turn, and I have fun. If I lose, it happens on someone else's turn, and I'm not even aware of it, so it doesn't bother me.
I'm not being a dick here, but I really honestly cannot understand why someone would care about how long other people take to play their turn. I really, really don't understand that. I don't pay the slightest attention to how long my opponents are spending on their turns and I honestly can't imagine why I would care. I play the turns in front of me, not the turns that are not in front of me.
If the issue is that you feel you're not playing enough, then join more games. I always have more turns in front of me than I actually have time to take.
At first, when I read this earlier, I logged off thinking that you made a pretty good argument.
Then I thought about it.
It doesn't really matter to me how you run your games. Go ahead. Run your games the way you like. That's cool. How you run your games?
Has zero effect on me. But I now have a third player running so many games that they can't keep up and are missing turns. Their choice has had a negative impact on at least a number of players (myself included) and how they run
their games. That needs to matter to you as a leader.
I find it frustrating because I personally only run so many games at any given time. I don't want to miss a turn. I make notes, even in these games as to where my next hit should be. And these players, in my estimation, with what I deem as self indulgent behaviour that mirrors someone taking all the chicken wings that are out at the pot luck supper because they can, don't care. The fact that they know you are waiting in line behind them? Waiting to get some wings? They don't give a shit. Their selfishness is an FU to everyone in line behind them.
I'll finish up my current games in this set. Then I'm done.
I know. It doesn't matter to you.
Ok.
E.