2dimes wrote:Or when someone was burned by some acid a "dragon" spit on them, the easiest way another person could explain it was to say, it breathed fire?
This COULD be a valid assumption, but, as far as I know, we will NEVER know the answer to such assumptions about how legends and stories really are started. Sitting around a campfire, in the woods or in a cave can cause the imagination to run wild. With no real Science, any explanation that made sense may have been easily accepted.
For Christians (and Jews, in regards to their scripture, or what Christians call the Old Testament) we believe that the Bible is the inspired word of God and such scenarios are not valid. Our faith says to believe the scripture, not as History and not as Science, but as MORAL Guidance for life. For me (and most Christians) the Bible is NOT a book of History (as jimb wants) nor a book of Science (as Duk seems to want).
I see the Old Testament (OT) as the recordings of a group of nomadic people, lessons passed down through oral history, that was at some point written down. But, as a Christian, I see the Bible as MORE, as the inspired word of God. Jesus often refers to scripture, the OT, as lesson, guidance, and as prophesies that point to Him as the Messiah, the Anointed One, the Christ.
As far as jimb's and saxi's allegation (about Moses), I doubt it. I offer the following evidence:
A source for the Moses story?
Some assume that the biblical story of Moses’ birth was based on the Sargon Birth Legend, but this is unlikely. Although ancient Sumerian accounts of Sargon the Great date back to his lifetime, the legendary account of his birth is known from only four fragmentary tablets—three from the Neo-Assyrian period (934–605 bc) and one from the Neo-Babylonian period (626–539 bc). During the Neo-Assyrian period an Assyrian king took the name Sargon II and likely commanded the legends to be written about his namesake (722–705 bc). By doing so, he would have linked himself to the ancient hero and glorified himself as a “revived Sargon” figure. This would suggest that the birth legend was composed for propaganda purposes well after the biblical story of Moses.
(...)
and more, same source:
Moses stands out against the stories of the ancient cultures because he isn’t promoted like their chosen figures, but saved and demoted to poverty so that he can lead others to salvation. He is the new archetype of the chosen hero—one who is promoted only for the benefit of others. Over and against the stories of worldly kingdoms, Moses’ story articulates God’s remarkable work for His kingdom. His values are different from ours, and as is often the case in retrospect, we can be grateful for that.
https://www.logos.com/grow/story-moses-based-ancient-legend/