Conquer Club

The good news is ralf is getting paid a lot to post this thread.

The bad news is he's getting paid in cargo shipping containers full of fecally contaminated Allium sativum.

If you think my simply quoting the words of a US Senator is the sort of content for which the only explanation is that I'm getting paid to write it by the Chinese government, does that mean you think US Senator Rick Scott is a potential Chinese government agent?

Honestly, this forum is cracking me up recently.

'Rick Scott thinks Chinese garlic is a national security threat'
'ralf stop spreading Chinese government disinformation!'

'Israel is bombing civilians and the US is enabling it'
'Hamas is forcing both of them to do it!'

And youse are probably just the sort of people to unironically say you think Chinese and Russian people are the ones brainwashed by government propaganda.

Beware of cabbage-head and turnip-head politicians.

bigtoughralf wrote:

jusplay4fun wrote:

bigtoughralf wrote:Article headline: Chinese garlic is a national security risk, says US Senator

strongandsensualralf's 'narrative': US Senator Rick Scott has today raised the alarm about a new threat to US national security: garlic

jp4: 'I can't see anything in the article that backs up ralf's narrative'

I said that the garlic threat is of no real significance, despite what ONE Senator (of 100) said, ralph. IDIOT. You prove your lack of intelligence with every post. Let me go back to ignore you; it is worthless to respond to you. I already said it; let me say it again for the THIRD time in 5 minutes: ralph = IDIOT.

Looking at the number of edits you've made to this post, if this is improved and polished version 3 then I hate to think how incoherent and screechy the first draft must have been.

Ralph lies again; what a pitiful person he is. Another worthless post by ralph.

Ralph reaches a totally ridiculous conclusion based on incorrect assumptions. Terrible logic.

You do realise it says 'edited 2 times in total' immediately under the post of yours that I said you had edited twice.

Do you know what year it is? Are you feeling dizzy at all?

bigtoughralf wrote:You do realise it says 'edited 2 times in total' immediately under the post of yours that I said you had edited twice.

Do you know what year it is? Are you feeling dizzy at all?

It simply means that I read and re-read my posts and do MINOR edits. I (1) saw a minor error (a misplaced "s") and (2) I found a better word to describe the situation. Unlike what you suggest, I do not clean up a big mess. I know that gives you pleasure to think so, BUT I am sorry to burst your bubble, weak-ralph.

As I already posted a few minutes ago, I am and feel fine. Thank you for your concern.

jusplay4fun wrote:Unlike what you suggest, I do not clean up a big mess.

I never suggested that I thought your edits had turned it into a good post tbf.

bigtoughralf wrote:

jusplay4fun wrote:Unlike what you suggest, I do not clean up a big mess.

I never suggested that I thought your edits had turned it into a good post tbf.

Fine, keep being a pathetic troll, ralph.

BTW and tbf, I make my really good posts even BETTER. Unlike you.