Moderator: Community Team
Votanic wrote:Constitutions are just pieces of paper, Donald Trump is a real human being.
Get your priorities in order.
Pack Rat wrote:Fascists for Trump!
jusplay4fun wrote:Pack Rat wrote:Fascists for Trump!
Doubtful.
The only two worse recent candidates for POTUS, besides, Trump and Biden, were Trump and Hillary.
Pack Rat wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:Pack Rat wrote:Fascists for Trump!
Doubtful.
The only two worse recent candidates for POTUS, besides, Trump and Biden, were Trump and Hillary.
Only a pissed off fascist would type something that absurd.
jusplay4fun wrote:Pack Rat wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:Pack Rat wrote:Fascists for Trump!
Doubtful.
The only two worse recent candidates for POTUS, besides, Trump and Biden, were Trump and Hillary.
Only a pissed off fascist would type something that absurd.
absurd? The premise of this thread is absurd. Any POTUS takes an oath to NOT do so.
Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: – “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
How did Trump, while President, threaten the US Constitution? Please offer specific evidence.
Constitution (CON): Constitution is a term which encompasses the character's physique, toughness, health and resistance to disease and poison; a high constitution score indicates superiority in all these attributes. The higher a character's constitution, the more hit points that character will have.
jusplay4fun wrote:Pack Rat wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:Pack Rat wrote:Fascists for Trump!
Doubtful.
The only two worse recent candidates for POTUS, besides, Trump and Biden, were Trump and Hillary.
Only a pissed off fascist would type something that absurd.
absurd? The premise of this thread is absurd. Any POTUS takes an oath to NOT do so.
Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: – “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
How did Trump, while President, threaten the US Constitution? Please offer specific evidence.
jusplay4fun wrote:Pack Rat wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:Pack Rat wrote:Fascists for Trump!
Doubtful.
The only two worse recent candidates for POTUS, besides, Trump and Biden, were Trump and Hillary.
Only a pissed off fascist would type something that absurd.
absurd? The premise of this thread is absurd. Any POTUS takes an oath to NOT do so.
Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: – “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
How did Trump, while President, threaten the US Constitution? Please offer specific evidence.
Votanic wrote:You mean the Colorado misruling that was rushed through by biased, leftist-politico judges, long before Trump is even convicted (if ever) of what they decided to determine without trial and then inappropriately punish without any legal (or reasonable) precendent.
...and yes, if Trump can be so outrageously sentenced both ante iudicium and in absentia, then this will also reightfully cast doubt on any other judgements that Trump may receive from biased and politically motivated courts.
If the Democrats continue to willfully confuse unjust court actions with a true 'Rule of Law', then there is significant trouble ahead the United States, both government and people.
Votanic wrote:You mean the Colorado misruling that was rushed through by biased, leftist-politico judges, long before Trump is even convicted (if ever) of what they decided to determine without trial and then inappropriately punish without any legal (or reasonable) precendent.
...and yes, if Trump can be so outrageously sentenced both ante iudicium and in absentia, then this will also reightfully cast doubt on any other judgements that Trump may receive from biased and politically motivated courts.
If the Democrats continue to willfully confuse unjust court actions with a true 'Rule of Law', then there is significant trouble ahead the United States, both government and people.
mookiemcgee wrote:Votanic wrote:You mean the Colorado misruling that was rushed through by biased, leftist-politico judges, long before Trump is even convicted (if ever) of what they decided to determine without trial and then inappropriately punish without any legal (or reasonable) precendent.
...and yes, if Trump can be so outrageously sentenced both ante iudicium and in absentia, then this will also reightfully cast doubt on any other judgements that Trump may receive from biased and politically motivated courts.
If the Democrats continue to willfully confuse unjust court actions with a true 'Rule of Law', then there is significant trouble ahead the United States, both government and people.
Did you read the opinions? Did you read the argument from the lawyers arguing against the Trumps removal from the ballot?
NONE OF THEM made a single argument suggesting he was 'innocent' of the infraction that would trigger the 14th ammendment. All the arguments were about if CO had the authority to enact the 14th, and if the 'the presidency' is an 'office' of the USG.
But i get it. Maybe you decided before you actually reading anything.
Here's the actual arguments, and opinions submmited by the justices.
https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfile ... 3SA300.pdf
Here's the best article I've read about the ruling (written by an actual lawyer).
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... edit-promo
Pack Rat wrote:Trump is a insurrectionist and a traitor. He is also a racist and a fascist.
The evidence is clear and most of the witnesses are Republicans. We can also included audio recordings to boot.
I won't bother your MAGA brain with his lousy business practices, as it would implode your brain.
The Republicans are a bunch of self-serving and spineless politicians who have put Party over Country.
When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume, among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of ...
GaryDenton wrote:But look at the arguments of the Right, they seem barely literate, can't read, and who see everything through their biased agenda.
It was the opposition that didn't even bother deciding Trump was innocent.
Dukasaur wrote:Myself, I am encouraged to see Nikki Haley surging.
Pack Rat wrote:Trump is a insurrectionist and a traitor. He is also a racist and a fascist.
The evidence is clear and most of the witnesses are Republicans. We can also included audio recordings to boot.
I won't bother your MAGA brain with his lousy business practices, as it would implode your brain.
The Republicans are a bunch of self-serving and spineless politicians who have put Party over Country.
The Charges That Were Notably Absent From the Trump Indictment
An indictment this week did not accuse former President Donald Trump of inciting the mob that attacked the Capitol, but it did show that some close to him knew violence might be coming.
There was something noticeably absent when the special counsel, Jack Smith, unsealed an indictment this week charging former President Donald J. Trump with multiple conspiracies to overturn the 2020 election: any count that directly accused Mr. Trump of being responsible for the violence his supporters committed at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
The indictment asserted that as violence erupted that day, Mr. Trump “exploited the disruption,” using it to further his goal of stopping the certification of his loss in the election. But it stopped short of charging him with actually encouraging or inciting the mob that stormed the building, chasing lawmakers from their duties.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users