The CC users appreciation poll

[Stopper]

Oh, also, although I can't off-hand think of any moral objections to necrophilia, I still wish to dissociate myself entirely from the practice.

And as for the necromancy, I hardly ever do it, but the most recent one caught out 3, yes three, people by my count, which in my opinion more than offsets the immaturity of the practice.

[gimil]

sorry dude, I had originally put in 35 people (took alot of time) but I was only allowed to enter 12 into the poll...

dont blame me

didnt bother to read teh full thread, but why dont you make 3 topics and split the candidaes between them? After those polls are done the winner of all 3 go into a final pole.

[The1exile]

Vote Mandy

I can't believe you put ronaldinho up there, who gives a crap about him

You also missed people off your list (by which I mean the extended one posted, not just the poll options) such as Guiscard, Backglass, heavycola and Bertros Bertros.

[0ojakeo0]

fircoal pulls ahead

[OnlyAmbrose]

Yeah, wheres the "other" option?

[hecter]

Erm, er, thanks for the votes and actually naming me in this thread, those who did, much appreciated...

I'm glad to hear meggy finds me usually at least mildly amusing. That's better than not long ago in real life, when a woman said to me, (completely and utterly unprompted), "I like the way you always make the effort to try and be funny."

Anyway, I'm not naming my favourite person. Not after the last time. But they have unfeasibly skinny legs.

She does have fairly skinny legs, doesn't she? Maybe you should feed her more of that pudding you're always offering her?

In terms of a moral objection to necrophilia, a dead body cannot give consent. How's that?

[Norse]

Vote Mandy

I can't believe you put ronaldinho up there, who gives a crap about him

You also missed people off your list (by which I mean the extended one posted, not just the poll options) such as Guiscard, Backglass, heavycola and Bertros Bertros.

well, I didnt mention all of those that were left out.

[misterman10]

sorry dude, I had originally put in 35 people (took alot of time) but I was only allowed to enter 12 into the poll...

dont blame me

didnt bother to read teh full thread, but why dont you make 3 topics and split the candidaes between them? After those polls are done the winner of all 3 go into a final pole.

you go do that

[reverend_kyle]

sorry dude, I had originally put in 35 people (took alot of time) but I was only allowed to enter 12 into the poll...

dont blame me

didnt bother to read teh full thread, but why dont you make 3 topics and split the candidaes between them? After those polls are done the winner of all 3 go into a final pole.

don't bring logic into this mister.

[Stopper]

In terms of a moral objection to necrophilia, a dead body cannot give consent. How's that?

OK. Just out of curiosity, what about sex dolls?

[Norse]

In terms of a moral objection to necrophilia, a dead body cannot give consent. How's that?

OK. Just out of curiosity, what about sex dolls?

Nah, they catagorically say no to me always.

[hecter]

In terms of a moral objection to necrophilia, a dead body cannot give consent. How's that?

OK. Just out of curiosity, what about sex dolls?

A sex doll was never living and does not have a consciousness. Therefor, it may be treated as your possession, and so consent is not needed.

[reverend_kyle]

In terms of a moral objection to necrophilia, a dead body cannot give consent. How's that?

OK. Just out of curiosity, what about sex dolls?

A sex doll was never living and does not have a consciousness. Therefor, it may be treated as your possession, and so consent is not needed.

You've put alot of thought into this haven't you?

[hecter]

In terms of a moral objection to necrophilia, a dead body cannot give consent. How's that?

OK. Just out of curiosity, what about sex dolls?

A sex doll was never living and does not have a consciousness. Therefor, it may be treated as your possession, and so consent is not needed.

You've put alot of thought into this haven't you?

Not really...

*lies naked in a bathtub*

Ready when you are.

[Norse]

A sex doll was never living and does not have a consciousness. Therefor, it may be treated as your possession, and so consent is not needed.

What about vegetables?

[reverend_kyle]

A sex doll was never living and does not have a consciousness. Therefor, it may be treated as your possession, and so consent is not needed.

What about vegetables?

same deal, they have to have a hole in them to fit your penis.

[Norse]

A sex doll was never living and does not have a consciousness. Therefor, it may be treated as your possession, and so consent is not needed.

What about vegetables?

same deal, they have to have a hole in them to fit your penis.

You could argue that they were once alive, growing, fattening like any other living organism. Who is to know whether they had a conciousness or not? albeit an autonomous one.

I just need to know if BK was wrong for doing what he did that that papaya.

[hecter]

A sex doll was never living and does not have a consciousness. Therefor, it may be treated as your possession, and so consent is not needed.

What about vegetables?

Similar to the sex doll, though a plant is considered living, it doesn't have consciousness, nor did it ever. Therefor, as long as you own said vegetable, you can do with it what you like.

[Stopper]

A sex doll was never living and does not have a consciousness. Therefor, it may be treated as your possession, and so consent is not needed.

What about vegetables?

Similar to the sex doll, though a plant is considered living, it doesn't have consciousness, nor did it ever. Therefor, as long as you own said vegetable, you can do with it what you like.

What about frozen chickens? That have been thawed out first.

[Norse]

What about frozen chickens? That have been thawed out first.

Necro-beastiality.

[hecter]

A sex doll was never living and does not have a consciousness. Therefor, it may be treated as your possession, and so consent is not needed.

What about vegetables?

Similar to the sex doll, though a plant is considered living, it doesn't have consciousness, nor did it ever. Therefor, as long as you own said vegetable, you can do with it what you like.

What about frozen chickens? That have been thawed out first.

That could be considered a form or bestiality or necrophilia. Though, one of the things about necrophilia is the fact that you are violating a corpse of a former person with friends and family, and, these friends and family would, presumably, object to having that persons corpse violated in such a way. However, I really don't think anybody (other than vegans and other animal rights activists) would object to you doing such a thing with a thawed out chicken... Why you would want to is a different story.

Despite what some people might think, I don't have all the answers. I've read stories about how people have hooked up a cow heart to a battery of some sort, to make this organic sex toy. Disturbing? Ya, kinda... Do I object? No. I can't think of any good reason too.

[DAZMCFC]

A sex doll was never living and does not have a consciousness. Therefor, it may be treated as your possession, and so consent is not needed.

What about vegetables?

Similar to the sex doll, though a plant is considered living, it doesn't have consciousness, nor did it ever. Therefor, as long as you own said vegetable, you can do with it what you like.

say you don`t own it is that rape.

i voted Stopper, some off his posts are very funny indeed and he is Scottish.

[hecter]

A sex doll was never living and does not have a consciousness. Therefor, it may be treated as your possession, and so consent is not needed.

What about vegetables?

Similar to the sex doll, though a plant is considered living, it doesn't have consciousness, nor did it ever. Therefor, as long as you own said vegetable, you can do with it what you like.

say you don`t own it is that rape.

No, it's just really gross, and you might lose a friend and/or get in big trouble if you do it to something that is supposed to be used for public consumption.

[Norse]

No, it's just really gross, and you might lose a friend and/or get in big trouble if you do it to something that is supposed to be used for public consumption.

howabout if I stole the vegtable to feed my starving family? and then I got horny and used it to feed my sick urges?

[hecter]

No, it's just really gross, and you might lose a friend and/or get in big trouble if you do it to something that is supposed to be used for public consumption.

howabout if I stole the vegtable to feed my starving family? and then I got horny and used it to feed my sick urges?

Then you have major issues, using a vegetable to satisfy your sick urges, rather than feed your starving family.