Moderator: Community Team
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Bob Guccione's Penthouse Magazine was basically a soft-core porn outlet. It also happened to be a tireless crusader for the rights of Vietnam Veterans and exposed numerous ways the American government sold out veterans' rights. Being A only proves that one is A. It does not prohibit one from also being B. Lots of publications earn their bread-and-butter appealing to horndogs whilst still doing legitimate and serious reporting on other fronts.mrswdk wrote:Oh, an article by the India Times?
I mean sure, it is possible that a newspaper based in India (China's regional geopolitical competitor and staunch US ally) has good reasons for publishing anti-China stories based only on unverified anecdotes gathered from a handful of anti-Chinese government campaigners. Then again, it's also possible the paper that drives traffic to its website by sticking cameras down celebrities' cleavage and then slut shaming them rather than apologizing is just a swamp where journalistic integrity goes to die.
Buzzfeed is another great example. Most of their site is clickbait trash, but their investigative reporting unit is really solid.Dukasaur wrote:Bob Guccione's Penthouse Magazine was basically a soft-core porn outlet. It also happened to be a tireless crusader for the rights of Vietnam Veterans and exposed numerous ways the American government sold out veterans' rights. Being A only proves that one is A. It does not prohibit one from also being B. Lots of publications earn their bread-and-butter appealing to horndogs whilst still doing legitimate and serious reporting on other fronts.mrswdk wrote:Oh, an article by the India Times?
I mean sure, it is possible that a newspaper based in India (China's regional geopolitical competitor and staunch US ally) has good reasons for publishing anti-China stories based only on unverified anecdotes gathered from a handful of anti-Chinese government campaigners. Then again, it's also possible the paper that drives traffic to its website by sticking cameras down celebrities' cleavage and then slut shaming them rather than apologizing is just a swamp where journalistic integrity goes to die.
Publishing soft porn and arguing for increased support for army soldiers are not contradictory positions. Claiming to be an objective and trustworthy source of information while also peeping on innocent women then trying to make out it's their fault are. The India Times will clearly say and do anything they like if they think it'll get readers - so we can't take them at face value when they say 'we found two random anti-CCP campaigners making unverified claims about the Chinese government - China is evil!'Dukasaur wrote:Bob Guccione's Penthouse Magazine was basically a soft-core porn outlet. It also happened to be a tireless crusader for the rights of Vietnam Veterans and exposed numerous ways the American government sold out veterans' rights. Being A only proves that one is A. It does not prohibit one from also being B.
Buzzfeed published the Trump dossier in full because, according to their editor, it's not the media's job to verify information before they spread it all over the internet. I don't understand how you can trust them as a source of investigative journalism - by the own admission they are pretty much the worst source of factual information out there.Metsfanmax wrote:Buzzfeed is another great example. Most of their site is clickbait trash, but their investigative reporting unit is really solid.

That was one questionable decision, sure. (I'll note that they published it admitting it was unverified, which you might think was wrong but is not the same as them endorsing the story without having thoroughly vetted it.) But they have done a lot of other work too, enough to convince me that they are on the whole a pretty solid source of information. For example, in academia they have broken a lot of the major stories about sexual harassment by high level professors, people who might otherwise have gotten away with abusing their students. (They also broke the story about Kevin Spacey.) And they recently published the in-depth story about Breitbart that has gotten a lot of praise.mrswdk wrote:Buzzfeed published the Trump dossier in full because, according to their editor, it's not the media's job to verify information before they spread it all over the internet. I don't understand how you can trust them as a source of investigative journalismMetsfanmax wrote:Buzzfeed is another great example. Most of their site is clickbait trash, but their investigative reporting unit is really solid.
lolwat. Not true.No Game of Thrones & even shows like Vampire Diaries are forbidden (forbidden is the word that the Chinese people use)
Also not true.It's even illegal to live with a girlfriend/boyfriend outside of marriage.
Don’t pay too much attention to dtf, he has a big time interest in chugging hard liquor.armati wrote:Just out of interest, your saying people cant visit somewhere else? no travel visas.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
I doubt it. You probably throw it out or leave it for the scavengers when you hunt.KoolBak wrote:I like chinese food.
Good job2dimes wrote:Wut the T in dtf stand for?
I'm working on learning how to say good bye in mandarin. I may return to trying to learn left and right but gave up. I am able to greet people and say thank you convincingly enough people ask if I'm fluent.
Have you been to Shanghi and Peking swdk?