how ironic would it be if andy got banned for spam or trolling or whatever the CC mods decide that picture is

For everybody who put biggest domestic policy failure in American history - you remember how we had human bondage slavery for almost 80 years after our formation of an independent state, right? Not to mention the whole systematic genocide of the First Nations, thing. But yeah, a badly programmed ...

yeah, as pessimistic as i tend to be about human nature, it seems like these people WANT to help the old men/ladies up, but are scared to do so because too much power has been given to ignorant government officials.

any power will be abused.

Innocence costs nothing.

Anyway, aren't you British? Why do you give a flying f*ck whether Zimmerman is guilty or not?

I don't,and my nationality is 100% irrelevant when giving an opinion on an international forum.Is that ok with you?Haven't noticed your nationality stopping you airing your ...

i'd say this is a troll thread, but you actually believe stupid shit like this, so it's hard to tell.

Tyrone was black, Zimmerman is Hispanic. They were both just victims of their system, participants in the Bum Fight that minority communities are locked in for the entertainment of the white viewer.

What race are hispanics?

a large majority of american hispanics are the same race.

also, he ...

some of them. not all. it's never "all". "all" is for the intellectually lazy

Huh, is Ron Paul still a "thing"?

his ideas have been a "thing" for over 200 years, get with the pogrom limey

I've seen the newsletters outlining his ideas.

he wrote newsletters? link pls?

I'm pretty sure you can google "Ron Paul Newsletters".

and you should google "op-ed"

Symmetry wrote:

john9blue wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Huh, is Ron Paul still a "thing"?

his ideas have been a "thing" for over 200 years, get with the pogrom limey

I've seen the newsletters outlining his ideas.

he wrote newsletters? link pls?

Symmetry wrote:Huh, is Ron Paul still a "thing"?

his ideas have been a "thing" for over 200 years, get with the program limey

Morally, what Zimmerman did was wrong. Yes, he was justified in defending himself. However, his self-defense did not occur in a vacuum (where Martin just randomly attacked him for no reason). Zimmerman followed Martin, was told by police not to continue following him, Zimmerman ignored the police ...

^ this. there's a fine balance between tyrannies of majority and minority. 60% had problems for sure, but 50% is too far in the other direction.

The only issue of race in this whole thing is racial profiling of black people by Zimmerman. I am a father and a grandfather. I could care less what race either of the people are. However, I believe Trayvon, a child, was killed by an adult vigilante. This is why this case pisses me off so much ...

notyou2 wrote:Because he was a child and the other person was a self appointed vigilante adult looking for trouble where there was none. Why are you bringing race into it?

because race is the reason you and all the other crusaders care so much about this case. why not concern yourself with other murders?

can i just ask why leftists have such a need to insist that the black guy must be the victim here? i know your ideology is backwards but this time you're just blatantly ignoring all the evidence (which most of you pride yourselves on NOT doing).

if people like you didn't make such a huge deal out ...

should've been 55% or something

50% is ridiculous and 60% can lead to tyranny of the minority

^ how was GZ declared innocent if TM wasn't engaged in criminal action?

Zimmerman wasn't declare innocent and he certainly wasn't declared not guilty of lesser crimes. Maybe you want to rephrase your question. Something like: "How was self defense a proper defense if Martin wasn't engaged in a ...

^ how was GZ declared innocent if TM wasn't engaged in criminal action?

LOL I WUZ JUST KIDDING THE WHOLE TIME LOL I TROLL U

seriously? this is your defense?

stand by your baseless ad-hominem arguments when i call you out on them, and maybe you can maintain a shred of my respect after being defeated.

And again, my point all along is that Zimmerman threatened Martin ...

he didn't get in one punch because he wasn't looking for a fight. he carried a gun for defense, not because he enjoys shooting people. martin initiated it and probably caught him by surprise.
You don't know any of that as fact. None. Zip. Zero.

it's very likely that what i just said was true ...

I never said it was at gunpoint. In fact, its been pointed out that martin absolutely did not know he had a gun. The fact that Zimmerman knew he had a gun though is relevant, because I doubt the pussy would have gotten within 50 feet of the guy otherwise. He didnt even get in one punch, against a ...

Zimmerman already showed bad judgement by ignoring Police by continuing to stalk and approach Martin.

He knew he had a gun, so given this reckless act, it is clear he engaged martin enough to get him to use his fists.

Now, obviously I dont know what he did, or why Martin considered him a threat ...

fitz, what exactly do you think zimmerman did that warranted being thrown to the ground and punched in the face?

honestly i think martin might be better off dead,

Wow

Why are you surprised? Typical Jb.

I'm sure his family feels the same way John.

hah! was wondering if anyone would sig that.

zimmerman might be better off dead too, but i'm starting to sound like a future serial killer so i'll stop now.

Why do you guys think Zimmerman is guilty this time? I don't get it

because people aren't separated into "good" and "evil" categories? most people in the world are selfish assholes, especially after suffering a media lynching, crushing legal debt, and the hatred of an entire race.

can you accept ...