Games with two teams or two players tend to be uninteresting and short. Adding more teams allowed in Polymorphic Games would make them more interesting and challenging.

I believe the calculation for the Win Percentage is faulty. It includes games currently in progress which can't be counted as a win nor a loss. ..But it's counted in the loss column for the purpose of calculating winning percentage on the Player Profile page, but not elsewhere, such as in the Player ...

I did not kill any cattle. Jesus .. just a suggestion and an oversight.

I believe the calculation for the Win Percentage is faulty. It includes games currently in progress which can't be counted as a win nor a loss. ..But it's counted in the loss column for the purpose of calculating winning percentage on the Player Profile page, but not elsewhere, such as in the Player ...

Thanks, Williams. I haven't found a teammate yet who will play as I ask, without getting insulted, because they all think they have better ideas. I'd love to find a teammate who shares my sensibilities.

I find, only a minimum of three teams or three players makes for a balanced, interesting game ...

I don't mean for this to be contentious. I just would like to play team games, with several teams, where I can command all the colors on my team. I feel like a team game would be much more satisfying for me if the other player(s) on my team had the same vision. I was under the notion that that was ...

Thanks, IcePack and Kingm. I appreciate that they have always been that way. I wonder why more players can't participate in a game, except that that's the rules.

Is there a technical issue with this ?

I'm wanting to create a polymorphic game. When it's all set up I get the following message : "Polymorphic games only available for 2 players".

I set up the game for 10 with two armies per player.

I don't know how to link that.

I'm sorry .. what do you mean "link" ?

When I set up a polymorphic game and set for 10 players, with two armies per team, I get an error message saying it can only be created with two players.

What's the issue with polymorphic games being played with more than two players ?

I wonder what is the status of this suggestion. It seems like this would be a valuable addition, just to have two boxes after choosing Auto-Attack, one for the number of troops the attacker wants left on their territory, the other, the number of troops the attacker wants left on the defender's ...

I, also, think we could expect see some reply from the designers. ..And, of course, I believe my suggestion is reasonable and would be very helpful.

paulk, I wonder how you envision it taking up too much space compared to your idea. You suggest two extra buttons. I suggest one extra button with a follow-up of two options.

Most versatile would be a button next to the Auto-Attack button for "Auto-Attack with Limitations". When that button is activated, a drop-down would have two options. "Number of Attacker's troops to be left" and "Number of opponent's troops to be left", with the standard number option. If both are ...

Please consider a rule whereas all truces and agreements between players must be reinstated in chat every so many (say, 30) rounds, otherwise they would be null and void. This would make sure truces are active and understood by all players. It would also allow a convenient way for a player, who no ...

Accused:

fleyderman
plapoint50



The accused are suspected of:

Conducting Secret Diplomacy



Game number(s):

21980769


Comments:

fleyderman and plapoint50 seem to be coordinating moves while nothing was said by them in game chat.

When it was brought to their attention, they admitted ...