lackattack wrote:Ooooh that's a bug - I'll have to disable hotkeys when you are selecting in the drop downs

Thanks!!

Could we possibly get an option to disable it completely? Specifically, the keyboard shortcuts. I just was playing, finished attacking (messed up and advanced in the wrong place, but that's just inexperience with the clickies), but when I went to go fort, I decided not to try to use the clicks ...

True, but not necessarily. because you advance on killing, not winning, there'll be the incentive to overextend and kill someone where you might not be able to cash in or where your cash in won't help.

GrimReaper. wrote:

tell me that means that the dice are still random...



ohh and attacks are now called assualts

Yeah, everything is still exactly the same. They just changed attack to assault, and cards to spoils. And turned two maps into simple dot-based maps with the same gameplay but less pretty graphics.

I would just like to point out for all the idiots out there. The new classic has exactly the same gameplay as the old one . Sure, it looks ugly, but it was a last-ditch thing. Leaving CC because you think a single map is ugly has got to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard of. There's over 50 other ...

Count me in

Sadness and agony, Blitz. Game 59230 is about to end. Zip deadbeated. But we made it over two years, so I'm almost positive that we have the longest ever game on cc. Especially since we weren't some dumb "friends building as high as possible" game, but were actually trying the whole time. Sad that ...

Not much to keep you posted on, Blitz. I was instigating much of the action, but now I've embraced my fellow players' laziness.

So juventino, me, and zipdisk should be on this list for oldest game (and I think we're in there as rounds also) #59230

For the hole, does the +1 for the warden require the guard 602 as well? It doesn't specify.

Map looks really cool, WM. One minor thing, and I don't know if you could do anything to fix this, but because the territory route lines and the border of the US is the same, it kinda looks like President connects to New York, especially in the small version where the line is n early straight. I ...

I voted for white 30% because it looks the best, in my opinion. However, in the interest of fairness, there should be a runoff of the top two choices when this poll closes. Otherwise, we could have white 30% (which is winning as of this post) win, when in fact a black one would win if its votes ...

Yeti_C, what I was saying was you'd have three people, one of whom would be winning, who would box the others into unplayable spots, then deadbeat. But the point is, you can already screw with people if you choose, they'll just get negative feedback. The only problem would occur if this kind of ...

In the legend, it sounds like you have to hold the boss plus 3 gang members, for a total of 4. I thought it was 3 including gang leader. Could you clear this up?

Cool map. Minor point, in the yard, every gang has three members except the blacks. Maybe swap out ted with raheem or something?

Map looks really cool, WM. One minor thing, and I don't know if you could do anything to fix this, but because the territory route lines and the border of the US is the same, it kinda looks like President connects to New York, especially in the small version where the line is n early straight.

Other than that, this map is awesome. I'm tired of starting in AoR and losing 10 guys in a row, and therefore losing the entire round because of one stupid unluckiness. I almost want to screw the map and just make this a game option, where everything is multiplied by ten.

[quote="Herakilla"][quote="DiM"][quote="Mr_Adams"]so what happens when nobody is getting any armies each turn, and all territories have 1's on them? the your screwed...[/quote]

what???[/quote]

hes saying that since you took out the territorial bonus what happens if you have no bonus from shops or ...

Hey could someone pm me the standard password? thx

Good work Lack! I like the "player online" tag on their avatar.

The only problem I see with this is that whoever ends the round could be forced to take his turn absolutely last if everyone teams up on him. Like, all 7 other people start their turns, but since the 8th guy is winning, they conspire against him, and then they can all go, then end their turns at the ...

Ahh, i see hector has already found such an answer.

I have a few ideas in my head for voluntary user-based censoring, but that still has some design issues and then has to be coded.


I'm too lazy to read more than the first two pages of this, but it seems to me that it is incredibly unfair to expect the mods to censor all language. However, I ...

I think this tournament discriminates. I'm the second player in my game, and even though I'm in the lead, the brackets already gave the victory to player 1! I cry foul, sir!

[quote= "DiM"] However, I think the two scoreboard idea isn't good. It's mostly put in to pacify those whiners, but it'll make it clumsy and confusing when every player is gaining and losing two separate amounts every game.

Instead, there should be a symbol next to each player, signifying the ...