Fircoal wrote:How was it not ironic. I was waiting to see who LSU had targeted to get a lead only for it to be me. Isn't that irony? And if not then what's your skew idea of irony?
Irony does not mean inconvenient or surprising event. Irony denotes the presence of a contradictory use or attribute of an event or concept:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ironyMy previous post employs an ironic tone. Despite the sacchrine promises of agreement and understanding, the whole ought indicate that I voted for you based on your unwillingness to defend yourself. Consider the following:
We know it isn't your fault, but pmchugh tried the same sort of laid-back approach and we just plum jumped the gun on him.
Literally, it suggests that we mistakenly killed pmchugh, as well as rationalizing your mysteriousness. However, we know that town lynched him because he was proven scum with the same method used today. That clearly belies my avowal that we don't hold you responsible.
To paraphrase the popular song, rain on your wedding day is not ironic. It is inconvenient, but fails to contradict the possibility or symbolism of the primarily indoor ceremony. Unless you asked LSU to not target you or perhaps you saw him targeting someone else last night, his choice falls well short of ironic.
I will admit one sincerity in my previous post. If you do happen to describe four night actions that others - or I - confirm, I will certainly unvote and defend you. However, as you ignored the opportunity again, I will revote to emphasize that I fail to share your patience:
I vote Fircoal,
in case / doesn't accept the other one
