Re: The Thing Day 4
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2023 9:50 pm
Nothing's stopping you. This was just a BT.strike wolf wrote:I'd like to talk more.
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://146673-www3.conquerclub.com/forum2/
http://146673-www3.conquerclub.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?t=240263
Nothing's stopping you. This was just a BT.strike wolf wrote:I'd like to talk more.
TrafalgarLaw01 wrote:But as someone pointed before we could have run out of backup vigs.
That was on D3, so we know I was town and had no reason to lie about that.degaston wrote:I just got a message that I now have the flamethrower, and I have unlimited uses.
I asked him this in a PM, and he said yes. You can ask him yourself, or he could post it in the thread.strike wolf wrote:Well, I mean after the BT. I like the plan though I'd like to be 100% sure that Vigging the recruiter would stop the recruit for the night. Is it true, DDS? Or maybe he actually said this more specifically than I remember.
No Strike mentioned on D4. Last page. Cant do multiple quotes rn as I am on the phone. But will tomorrow if needed.degaston wrote:TrafalgarLaw01 wrote:But as someone pointed before we could have run out of backup vigs.That was on D3, so we know I was town and had no reason to lie about that.degaston wrote:I just got a message that I now have the flamethrower, and I have unlimited uses.
Incorrect.strike wolf wrote:Wait. We have to lynch Vot because if we guess wrong on Traf or Rage than it's game over and cult wins.
To be clear, this would require Rag to vote to lynch himself, because I assume the Things (in this example, Vot and Traf) would not want to go along with this plan.degaston wrote:Incorrect.strike wolf wrote:Wait. We have to lynch Vot because if we guess wrong on Traf or Rage than it's game over and cult wins.
Assuming you're proven to be town, and therefore Vot is the original Thing.
If we lynch Rag and we're wrong, then after I vig Vot, there is no way for the Things to recruit someone new that night, so the next day it will be you, me, and Traf.
Traf is the last Thing, and you and I can lynch him without a BT. (or we can do a BT so that DDS can post the positive reaction for once)
DDS can rule on this, but in this case that would make no sense since town has a night kill and cult doesn't.strike wolf wrote:Games generally end when town no longer outnumbers the scum group. So I think your ability to vig Vot after the lynch may be irrelevant.
@DDS: Right?
Right. Game ends when town no longer holds majoritystrike wolf wrote:Games generally end when town no longer outnumbers the scum group. So I think your ability to vig Vot after the lynch may be irrelevant.
@DDS: Right?
Yes. Kills are before conversion.strike wolf wrote:Well, I mean after the BT. I like the plan though I'd like to be 100% sure that Vigging the recruiter would stop the recruit for the night. Is it true, DDS? Or maybe he actually said this more specifically than I remember.
Would you mind unvoting until we have a BT?Ragian wrote:Wow. You get five hours of sleep and the thread explodes. I've been saying it's Vot from D2, but no one is listening. Just see how little he adds. I've only skimmed (busy morning). Will read up when work calms down a bit.
Better put my vote where my mouth is. vote votanic
To be clear, If Vot is not the Thing, then Strike and his recruit could hammer to win the game.Ragian wrote:Wow. You get five hours of sleep and the thread explodes. I've been saying it's Vot from D2, but no one is listening. Just see how little he adds. I've only skimmed (busy morning). Will read up when work calms down a bit.
Better put my vote where my mouth is. vote votanic
How can you say that Strike is scummier than Votanic? Vot has been non-committal throughout the game. I wanted his blood D2. No one caved. I wanted his blood D3. No one caved. I mean...look at this:degaston wrote:I went through about as much of the history as I could stand to see if I should choose Strike or Vot instead of Charle, and maybe Strike was a tiny bit scummier than Vot, but if I chose wrong then town would be dead today, so I went with Charle.
So... who wants to be BT'd today?
"Let's BT. I'm not votig anyone, of course." Same shit, different day.Votanic wrote:Well... I guess it's obvious how strike and myself will vote.
I might add that strike did not convert me last night.
...Oh yeah, and for that matter, neither did I convert him.
So the sooner we BT the sooner this will be resolved.
We know that you're town, Strike. I mean, look at your gameplay and compare it to Votanic's. You're constantly sticking your neck out. Even if you were converted, we should just lynch Votanic. Tomorrow, there's no recruit and thus it's 3v1. We BT one, force a no lynch, and so on.strike wolf wrote:Actually I take it back. It's slightly better for everyone to know I'm town and give us better odds at finding the recruit quicker. So BT me.
If the recruit can't recruit then if we use the vig, we should still be in a 2 v1 situation if the vig shot misses and if I'm known town then town will know who the recruit is after the failed vig shot. If in the unlikely scenario that the recruit can recruit then the 50/50 vig shot would be our only chance. If I'm not BTed then Dega would have a 1 in 3 chance of hitting right. Even in the non-recruit situation, Dega using the shot would confirm him as still town.
Oh lord... See... This is too elaborate, and now my spider sense flare up again. What if you were the last backup vig and converted? I get it that it doesn't say in the scene. I'm with you. All the way. Until you end here. All of this hinges on the fact that you are not converted, and we only have your word (and, to the extent that it matters, the scene's) word for it.degaston wrote:I have a new plan to handle the possibility where a recruit can become the recruiter if the original Thing dies.
If the original Thing is lynched, then we could assume the recruited would take over that night, and submit their recruitment choice.
But if the original Thing is vigged, then they should get no recruitment that night, and the recruited would not get a chance until the next night. (Because night results aren't normally calculated until all actions have been submitted.)
So the problem is, how do we guarantee that we vig the Thing.
We BT Strike.
If it comes back innocent, then Vot is the Thing, and he recruited either Rag or Traf.
So we lynch either Rag or Traf and I'll vig Vot.
If we lynch correctly, then both things are dead and town wins immediately.
If we lynch incorrectly, then the next day Strike and I are guaranteed town, and can lynch whichever one of Rag or Traf we didn't lynch the previous day.
If it comes back guilty, then Strike is either the recruiter or the recruited.
In this case, we lynch Vot, and I'll vig Strike.
If Strike recruited Vot, or vice-versa, then they are both dead and town wins immediately.
If Strike recruited Rag or Traf, then we (Rag, Traf, and I) BT one of them, and can lynch correctly depending on the result.
This will work the same if we swap the actions for Vot and Strike.
Half three in the morning, mate. I'm sorry that I'm asleepstrike wolf wrote:*Shrugs* I was going to wait for Ragian to comment but I'm currently believing Traf and this will clear the air some.
BT Strike
Again, all of this hinges on the fact that DDS would include it in the scene if the backup vig was recruited. I have seen no other clues to indicate who was recruited. I've only seen a hint that the vig changed.degaston wrote:Charle had the FT on D1 & D2.TrafalgarLaw01 wrote:Because we can not be sure u are not the recruited. You and Strike can come up with this plan to make us believe you are still vig and its a certain town win just not to be.
At the start of D3, we got the message:I have proven that I now have the FT, and that it happened because Charle was recruited. We did not get a similar message at the start of D4, so I still have it.DirtyDishSoap wrote:An unlikely hero has found the flamethrower abandoned.
The Thing would not want to try the same thing again - there would be no reason to expect a different result. If he did, then it would be very easy for town to BT Vot or Strike, then lynch the correct one according to the results, then whoever got the FT could vig me, knowing that I had been recruited.
I have never been in a cult game where the recruiting ability moves down the line. Have you? You're pushing this too hard for my liking. Just like Sonic did.degaston wrote: If it's positive, then it's because Strike wanted you to lynch him so that I can't vig him, and his recruit will get a chance to recruit someone else.
If it's negative and you lynch Vot, then it's because YOU are the recruit, and you want the chance to recruit someone else.
degaston wrote:I asked him this in a PM, and he said yes. You can ask him yourself, or he could post it in the thread.strike wolf wrote:Well, I mean after the BT. I like the plan though I'd like to be 100% sure that Vigging the recruiter would stop the recruit for the night. Is it true, DDS? Or maybe he actually said this more specifically than I remember.
Thank you!strike wolf wrote:Wait. We have to lynch Vot because if we guess wrong on Traf or Rage than it's game over and cult wins.
This was shortly after I had posted this:Ragian wrote:How can you say that Strike is scummier than Votanic? Vot has been non-committal throughout the game. I wanted his blood D2. No one caved. I wanted his blood D3. No one caved. I mean...look at this:degaston wrote:I went through about as much of the history as I could stand to see if I should choose Strike or Vot instead of Charle, and maybe Strike was a tiny bit scummier than Vot, but if I chose wrong then town would be dead today, so I went with Charle.
So... who wants to be BT'd today?
"Let's BT. I'm not votig anyone, of course." Same shit, different day.Votanic wrote:Well... I guess it's obvious how strike and myself will vote.
I might add that strike did not convert me last night.
...Oh yeah, and for that matter, neither did I convert him.
So the sooner we BT the sooner this will be resolved.
So he was just following my request. Which is sensible considering a single vote puts someone at L-2 with two scum.degaston wrote:I think we should just say how we intend to vote instead of making an official BT vote.
Think about it. If you were scum, would you take a chance on recruiting me given what happened after he recruited Charle?Ragian wrote:That was a lot of "we should do this" all hinging on the fact that Dega wasn't converted.
Yeah, Ragian. Stop skimming...degaston wrote:Would you mind unvoting until we have a BT?Ragian wrote:Wow. You get five hours of sleep and the thread explodes. I've been saying it's Vot from D2, but no one is listening. Just see how little he adds. I've only skimmed (busy morning). Will read up when work calms down a bit.
Better put my vote where my mouth is. vote votanic
And please read my posts.