Time(28) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(32) FINAL BoFM Wins

Finished challenges between two competitive clans.

Moderator: Clan Directors

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Ryno99
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:08 am
Gender: Male

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [bofm winner

Post by Ryno99 »

Great battle Time you definitely held your own and had us on the ropes til the very end.
eddie2
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Gender: Male
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [bofm winner

Post by eddie2 »

Hold the horses somthing has come to light.
ljex
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:12 am

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [bofm winner

Post by ljex »

eddie2 wrote:Hold the horses somthing has come to light.


which is?
User avatar
jefjef
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [bofm winner

Post by jefjef »

ljex wrote:
eddie2 wrote:Hold the horses somthing has come to light.


which is?


Well. Knowing eddie and his desperation for a victory it is probably about Megas and I getting our new clan KOA approved Thu Dec 02. Which really has no bearing on anything. We only had/have 1 active clan war game in progress which is going to be a loss for BotFM. The war will still be a victory for the Mermaids. ;)

So maybe he wants that game disqualified. Go for it.

If that's what it is then Suck it up cupcake. Accept the loss and move on...
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
4 U 2 NV
Posts: 770
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 2:41 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Post by 4 U 2 NV »

doubt eddie would use that excuse to pull off a win. it would just be hypocritical of him seeing his stance on the whole KORT/TOFU fiasco
Image
User avatar
4 U 2 NV
Posts: 770
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 2:41 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Post by 4 U 2 NV »

double posted. congrats to BotFM for the win and to TIME for putting up a great battle
Image
User avatar
drunkmonkey
Posts: 1704
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Post by drunkmonkey »

Seriously...just post the final score and move on. It was a fantastic battle, of which no one expected this close of an outcome. Well played, both clans.
Image
sdh
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 7:43 am

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Post by sdh »

eddie mentioned this to me, it has nothing to do with KOA. Still can't see it changing the score though.
User avatar
Eyestone
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:45 am
Gender: Male
Location: Trondheim - Norway

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Post by Eyestone »

:lol: :lol: :lol: "Under ivestigation" :lol: :lol: :lol:
eddie2
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Gender: Male
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Post by eddie2 »

JefJef i am not that petty. there has been a possible breach of a said site rule during the challenge i have put 3 options out there for this to be dealt with. and will update this thread accordingly once a final response is made about what happens. After contact between clans has finished. and ps a couple of other clan leaders have noticed the same thing, but have not acted on it because of the win of the challenge.
BoganGod
Posts: 5873
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 7:08 am
Gender: Male
Location: Heaven's Gate Retirement Home

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Post by BoganGod »

We won, TIME lost, we WON under manned with one important player in hospital(9games)....... Please don't do this to yourself eddie. I would like to think you are smarter than this.
Image
eddie2
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Gender: Male
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Post by eddie2 »

BoganGod wrote:We won, TIME lost, we WON under manned with one important player in hospital(9games)....... Please don't do this to yourself eddie. I would like to think you are smarter than this.


bogan do what i gave you 3 options that cover it all. all i can say is have your win.the win or lose does not really bother me, the player in hospital i feel sorry for but that has nothing to do with this incident. At the end of it there has been abuse of babysitting in the games and bofm will have to pay one way or another for this. or since you want to bring i9t to the forums i should post all the evidence and see what the clan world say about it.
ljex
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:12 am

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Post by ljex »

eddie2 wrote:
BoganGod wrote:We won, TIME lost, we WON under manned with one important player in hospital(9games)....... Please don't do this to yourself eddie. I would like to think you are smarter than this.


bogan do what i gave you 3 options that cover it all. all i can say is have your win.the win or lose does not really bother me, the player in hospital i feel sorry for but that has nothing to do with this incident. At the end of it there has been abuse of babysitting in the games and bofm will have to pay one way or another for this. or since you want to bring i9t to the forums i should post all the evidence and see what the clan world say about it.


you shouldn't have brought it to the forms at all if you weren't going to share your evidence...now i don't know what you should do as i don't know what the evidence is.
User avatar
jrh_cardinal
Posts: 2688
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:15 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Post by jrh_cardinal »

ljex wrote:you shouldn't have brought it to the forms at all if you weren't going to share your evidence...now i don't know what you should do as i don't know what the evidence is.

agreed. Trying to resolve it through PMs was a good decision, but posting "under investigation" was the worst choice you could make.
You're trying to act like your taking the high road, while standing naked jumping and screaming "I'm mature, I didn't post it publicly"
Image
User avatar
MegasWoman
Posts: 505
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:29 am
Gender: Female
Location: Texas

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31)

Post by MegasWoman »

What you managed to do EDDIE was let other clans know NOT to do a clan war with you. You are now grasping at straws and a sore loser. Take it like a man and MOVE ON.
[bigimg]http://data1.whicdn.com/images/27699975/large.jpg[/bigimg]][/color]
LIVE well, LAUGH often, LOVE much...[/color]
Tourney win D-Day 6000+ Triples
Tourney win 2v2 Series - Japan
Winner! Map Champ Challenge Tournament # 3 - Egypt-Nubia
User avatar
Lubawski
Posts: 1093
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Boston, Mass

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Post by Lubawski »

eddie2 wrote: At the end of it there has been abuse of babysitting in the games and bofm will have to pay one way or another for this. or since you want to bring i9t to the forums i should post all the evidence and see what the clan world say about it.


Could it really have been that bad? You have a 15 game max allowance, and according to your script in the OP, the most anyone has played is 10 games. There would have been no reason to inappropriately babysit someone's account.
Image
eddie2
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Gender: Male
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Post by eddie2 »

Lubawski wrote:
eddie2 wrote: At the end of it there has been abuse of babysitting in the games and bofm will have to pay one way or another for this. or since you want to bring i9t to the forums i should post all the evidence and see what the clan world say about it.


Could it really have been that bad? You have a 15 game max allowance, and according to your script in the OP, the most anyone has played is 10 games. There would have been no reason to inappropriately babysit someone's account.


Like i said previously i will update this thread when bofm respond i will also now need to post all info about this. i will do tomorow.
User avatar
MegasWoman
Posts: 505
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:29 am
Gender: Female
Location: Texas

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31)

Post by MegasWoman »

ofcourse you do! That was your intent all along-since you lost now it's time for dragging people through the mud. Typical.
[bigimg]http://data1.whicdn.com/images/27699975/large.jpg[/bigimg]][/color]
LIVE well, LAUGH often, LOVE much...[/color]
Tourney win D-Day 6000+ Triples
Tourney win 2v2 Series - Japan
Winner! Map Champ Challenge Tournament # 3 - Egypt-Nubia
User avatar
jrh_cardinal
Posts: 2688
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:15 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Post by jrh_cardinal »

Lubawski wrote:Could it really have been that bad? You have a 15 game max allowance, and according to your script in the OP, the most anyone has played is 10 games. There would have been no reason to inappropriately babysit someone's account.

Then the OP is out of date, people have played more than 10.
Speaking of, eddie, you definitely need to update. There are at least 10 games that are completed and that you have scored, but aren't marked with winners, along with the very old screenshots of games played (at least the 3rd one is very old). I don't mean to bring up old problems, but weren't you the one saying the incident was korts fault because they didn't update the op? Maybe you should follow your own rules.

MegasWoman wrote:ofcourse you do! That was your intent all along-since you lost now it's time for dragging people through the mud. Typical.

You're in the clan, learn what you're talking about before you starting flaming everyone else. Typical bofm.
Image
eddie2
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Gender: Male
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Post by eddie2 »

jrh_cardinal wrote:
Lubawski wrote:Could it really have been that bad? You have a 15 game max allowance, and according to your script in the OP, the most anyone has played is 10 games. There would have been no reason to inappropriately babysit someone's account.

Then the OP is out of date, people have played more than 10.
Speaking of, eddie, you definitely need to update. There are at least 10 games that are completed and that you have scored, but aren't marked with winners, along with the very old screenshots of games played (at least the 3rd one is very old). I don't mean to bring up old problems, but weren't you the one saying the incident was korts fault because they didn't update the op? Maybe you should follow your own rules.

MegasWoman wrote:ofcourse you do! That was your intent all along-since you lost now it's time for dragging people through the mud. Typical.

You're in the clan, learn what you're talking about before you starting flaming everyone else. Typical bofm.


jrh the play list was updated before the 3rd set was played and i have said i will finish off the updates when all games are finished and close it down same time.
User avatar
jefjef
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Post by jefjef »

jrh_cardinal wrote:
MegasWoman wrote:ofcourse you do! That was your intent all along-since you lost now it's time for dragging people through the mud. Typical.

You're in the clan, learn what you're talking about before you starting flaming everyone else. Typical bofm.


Learn what YOU are talking about.

Megas is no longer part of the Brethren and this is no where close to a flame.

Typical baited post from you. Welcome to my foe list.

BYE.

As for the clan war. It is a Brethren win. In no way can a sitter taking a turn for bogan be considered as for strategic purposes.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
MegasWoman
Posts: 505
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:29 am
Gender: Female
Location: Texas

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31)

Post by MegasWoman »

Whoever you are JRH. I was BOFM and part of the challenge (hence the name of the thread?) so why don't you go find your own and put your issues in there. And since I know exactly what the "under investigation" for Eddie is-why don't you follow your own advice and learn what you are talking about before you go running off at the mouth at me.
[bigimg]http://data1.whicdn.com/images/27699975/large.jpg[/bigimg]][/color]
LIVE well, LAUGH often, LOVE much...[/color]
Tourney win D-Day 6000+ Triples
Tourney win 2v2 Series - Japan
Winner! Map Champ Challenge Tournament # 3 - Egypt-Nubia
eddie2
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Gender: Male
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31)

Post by eddie2 »

MegasWoman wrote:Whoever you are JRH. I was BOFM and part of the challenge (hence the name of the thread?) so why don't you go find your own and put your issues in there. And since I know exactly what the "under investigation" for Eddie is-why don't you follow your own advice and learn what you are talking about before you go running off at the mouth at me.



megas plz there are 3 or 4 clan leaders i notified of this situation before i posted. and all have said this is cheating.(1 of them has even said they noticed the same thing but did not pursue it because they won the challenge.) also saying the offers i gave you were reasonable. now as for me going to post this all along plz read the thread i stated that there was an issue and i would update the thread once the issue had been resolved.(only stating the outcome of it.) then bogangod came in making it sound like i was punishing your old clan for a player being in hospital.(i do not know what player but he was not involved in the issue.) also since you are no longer a member of bofm you do not know all the information. but i still can not finish off the thread till i have had a official response from bogangod or a bofm leader. not 2 old members of the clan.
User avatar
Arama86n
Posts: 2275
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31)

Post by Arama86n »

eddie2 wrote:
MegasWoman wrote:Whoever you are JRH. I was BOFM and part of the challenge (hence the name of the thread?) so why don't you go find your own and put your issues in there. And since I know exactly what the "under investigation" for Eddie is-why don't you follow your own advice and learn what you are talking about before you go running off at the mouth at me.



megas plz there are 3 or 4 clan leaders i notified of this situation before i posted. and all have said this is cheating.(1 of them has even said they noticed the same thing but did not pursue it because they won the challenge.) also saying the offers i gave you were reasonable. now as for me going to post this all along plz read the thread i stated that there was an issue and i would update the thread once the issue had been resolved.(only stating the outcome of it.) then bogangod came in making it sound like i was punishing your old clan for a player being in hospital.(i do not know what player but he was not involved in the issue.) also since you are no longer a member of bofm you do not know all the information. but i still can not finish off the thread till i have had a official response from bogangod or a bofm leader. not 2 old members of the clan.


Very intersting eddie. A clan refrained from accusing us because they won the challenge? hmm
Before defeating TIME, BoFM defeated (in order from today backwards); Imperial Dragoons, Legends of the Zone, the Last Warriors, Fist Full of 6's, Grim Reapers.
First then, about one and a half year ago or so did BoFM lose a clanwar, against Knights of the Round Table at the time. Are you suggesting that KoRT are accusing us of cheating? or have you been digging even further back perhaps? Because before that challenge, half of todays clan wasn't even here, including BoganGod.

This whole issue is absurd and pathetic. You are trying to exploit an honest mistake and make as huge a deal of it as you can. And what really makes me sick is that in the first PM you sent to me, you hinted that you got the idea for these accusations because one of your own members has been reprimanded for Babysitting abuse, points dumping, (and today been busted with a multi).

I can honestly say that TIME has not been wronged in anyway in this challenge, and it truly makes one sick how low you are willing to sink.
eddie2
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Gender: Male
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31)

Post by eddie2 »

Arama86n wrote:
eddie2 wrote:
MegasWoman wrote:Whoever you are JRH. I was BOFM and part of the challenge (hence the name of the thread?) so why don't you go find your own and put your issues in there. And since I know exactly what the "under investigation" for Eddie is-why don't you follow your own advice and learn what you are talking about before you go running off at the mouth at me.



megas plz there are 3 or 4 clan leaders i notified of this situation before i posted. and all have said this is cheating.(1 of them has even said they noticed the same thing but did not pursue it because they won the challenge.) also saying the offers i gave you were reasonable. now as for me going to post this all along plz read the thread i stated that there was an issue and i would update the thread once the issue had been resolved.(only stating the outcome of it.) then bogangod came in making it sound like i was punishing your old clan for a player being in hospital.(i do not know what player but he was not involved in the issue.) also since you are no longer a member of bofm you do not know all the information. but i still can not finish off the thread till i have had a official response from bogangod or a bofm leader. not 2 old members of the clan.


Very intersting eddie. A clan refrained from accusing us because they won the challenge? hmm
Before defeating TIME, BoFM defeated (in order from today backwards); Imperial Dragoons, Legends of the Zone, the Last Warriors, Fist Full of 6's, Grim Reapers.
First then, about one and a half year ago or so did BoFM lose a clanwar, against Knights of the Round Table at the time. Are you suggesting that KoRT are accusing us of cheating? or have you been digging even further back perhaps? Because before that challenge, half of todays clan wasn't even here, including BoganGod.

This whole issue is absurd and pathetic. You are trying to exploit an honest mistake and make as huge a deal of it as you can. And what really makes me sick is that in the first PM you sent to me, you hinted that you got the idea for these accusations because one of your own members has been reprimanded for Babysitting abuse, points dumping, (and today been busted with a multi).

I can honestly say that TIME has not been wronged in anyway in this challenge, and it truly makes one sick how low you are willing to sink.



no i got the information for this because of a comment about 2 many players having a password for the said player. but buddysystem was on holiday when he was being sat for. not posting in the forums and playing speed games. while other players were taking his shots in team games.
Locked

Return to “Complete Challenges”