Conquer Club

Thezzaruz wrote:

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Yes this definitely sucks as I would have gladly given up the doc protection for the actual cop.

Interestingly though he's listed as "Flavour Cop". Would have been nice to know a bit more about his results as they usually look quite different from a regular cop results.


Also still a few that haven't disclosed if their role changed (I just assuming that LSU had another go tonight).

The results were mostly just telling artemis the name.... With a little research, that wasn't much of a problem.

can we have a prod of those not posting today?

Oh, it's day time. How the heck did scum, get lucky enough to kill the flavor cop? Granted, unless you know the show then flavor cop is kinda a useless role.....but still. Anyway, I'll reread everything posted so far today and figure out who to vote for.

no change for me, this shit is getting confusing

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:can we have a prod of those not posting today?

alright, sending prods.

ok sorry guys, as i said in another topic somewhere, im extremely busy atm, but my role didnt change.

Well this was a lively place...

By my count the ones that still haven't answered is Fir, icedagger and Tal (avoided it in his post). So what's our course of action if they keep lurking?

Thezzaruz wrote:By my count the ones that still haven't answered is Fir, icedagger and Tal (avoided it in his post). So what's our course of action if they keep lurking?

If the targets have spoken, Talapus and LSU make their respective declarations or accusations. On that note, I don't expect LSU tested Talapus last night, Thezzaruz. I should hope at least one has spoken, which may provoke the other anyway as claims or defenses come in.

I am interested in hearing how you don't have a conflict of interest if you aren't FULCRUM again. You wouldn't hold out on us, would you Thezzaruz?

Nzen wrote:I am interested in hearing how you don't have a conflict of interest if you aren't FULCRUM again. You wouldn't hold out on us, would you Thezzaruz?

Interestingly enough the set-up meant there was no problem. I had no info during my first role that didn't become public knowledge with my death scene (I wouldn't have offered to sub otherwise and I'm sure the / wouldn't have let me either).

Sorry about the inactivity. My role didn't change.

Not a single vote a week into day? Twelve day deadline because you all are boring, what happened to the "game" part of the game?

Yeah sorry, have been busy with RL and really need to reread to find out what the fecks going on. Should be able to post something more substantial tomorrow

Thezzaruz wrote:Well this was a lively place...

By my count the ones that still haven't answered is Fir, icedagger and Tal (avoided it in his post). So what's our course of action if they keep lurking?

I wouldn't say I avoided it. Again if my role had changed I would have said something. However I chose LSU as my target last night and find it interesting his role did not change. He's either scum with the other 2 guys or there is some roleblocker with a grudge out there that keeps targeting me.....either way, I'm not sure what is going on.

Talapus wrote:However I chose LSU as my target last night and find it interesting his role did not change. He's either scum with the other 2 guys or there is some roleblocker with a grudge out there that keeps targeting me.....either way, I'm not sure what is going on.

I would expect his role to be unchangeable just as your where when he targeted you.



So only fircoal left to report in then...

/ wrote:Not a single vote a week into day? Twelve day deadline because you all are boring, what happened to the "game" part of the game?

I would say that it's a direct effect of having a bunch of inactives/lurkers.

Thezzaruz wrote:So only fircoal left to report in then...

It didn't change. So LSU who did you target then?

why i targeted you fircoal.

Well then, no change meant scum according to general consensus right? So in absence of a strong and believable claim fir is the logical choice for the lynch. Or have I missed something?

I do believe that a role name at a minimum should be done by fircoal

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:why i targeted you fircoal.

How ironic.

Heh...

BElieve it or not, I don't have mah role name as I haven't saved an role pms for a long time since I suck at deleting messages and saving. (Laziness and packrat insticts make it a hard task.) I could always ask / for mah rolename but meh I'd rather not, as I don't find it that important as you'll just take different "scummy" things from it and see this as an excuse blahdy blahby blah. Whatever. Lynch me if you want. I'll tell you the REAL important info. I'm a watcher. If you want me to tell you who I watched and what I know then so be it. I can't gaurtnee you perfect results as I've forget some stuff but whatever. I have mah knowledge on the plate take it if you want it. Btw I'm pretty sure I know who a certain role is.

Hmm, seems like an excellent WIFOM.

william18 wrote:Hmm, seems like an excellent WIFOM.

It is

Fircoal wrote:BElieve it or not, I don't have mah role name as I haven't saved an role pms for a long time since I suck at deleting messages and saving. (Laziness and packrat insticts make it a hard task.)
(...)
I'm a watcher. If you want me to tell you who I watched and what I know then so be it. I can't gaurtnee you perfect results as I've forget some stuff but whatever. I have mah knowledge on the plate take it if you want it. Btw I'm pretty sure I know who a certain role is.

Let's ease into this, Fircoal. No sense in rushing your defense with eleven days left. But, we would very much like to maybe hear who you watched Fircoal.

See, claims are such tricky things that we can only control our paranoid impulses with the evidence that you allude to, yet fail to express. We know it isn't your fault, but pmchugh tried the same sort of laid-back approach and we just plum jumped the gun on him. If only he had taken the situation a little more seriously, he might have survived to this day. I personally would not like to see a repeat of that dreadful mistake, so I am going to have to be firm for the greater good.

- - - - - - - - Fircoal, I'm voting for you. - - - - - - - - -

But, don't think this is the end between us. I am rapt with anticipation of your reply. Don't worry about perfect results. So long as you describe four player's night actions as revealed to you by /, this purely formal suspicion will evaporate and we can rely on analysis to ferret out the bad man still slinking at our feet.

Fircoal wrote:

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:why i targeted you fircoal.

How ironic.

Heh...

BElieve it or not, I don't have mah role name as I haven't saved an role pms for a long time since I suck at deleting messages and saving. (Laziness and packrat insticts make it a hard task.) I could always ask / for mah rolename but meh I'd rather not, as I don't find it that important as you'll just take different "scummy" things from it and see this as an excuse blahdy blahby blah. Whatever. Lynch me if you want. I'll tell you the REAL important info. I'm a watcher. If you want me to tell you who I watched and what I know then so be it. I can't gaurtnee you perfect results as I've forget some stuff but whatever. I have mah knowledge on the plate take it if you want it. Btw I'm pretty sure I know who a certain role is.

I'm tempted to vote for you just for the gross misuse of the word "ironic". But yeah, get your character name and tell us your watcher results and we'll go from there

icedagger wrote:

Fircoal wrote:

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:why i targeted you fircoal.

How ironic.

Heh...

BElieve it or not, I don't have mah role name as I haven't saved an role pms for a long time since I suck at deleting messages and saving. (Laziness and packrat insticts make it a hard task.) I could always ask / for mah rolename but meh I'd rather not, as I don't find it that important as you'll just take different "scummy" things from it and see this as an excuse blahdy blahby blah. Whatever. Lynch me if you want. I'll tell you the REAL important info. I'm a watcher. If you want me to tell you who I watched and what I know then so be it. I can't gaurtnee you perfect results as I've forget some stuff but whatever. I have mah knowledge on the plate take it if you want it. Btw I'm pretty sure I know who a certain role is.

I'm tempted to vote for you just for the gross misuse of the word "ironic". But yeah, get your character name and tell us your watcher results and we'll go from there

How was it not ironic. I was waiting to see who LSU had targeted to get a lead only for it to be me. Isn't that irony? And if not then what's your skew idea of irony?

Fircoal wrote:How was it not ironic. I was waiting to see who LSU had targeted to get a lead only for it to be me. Isn't that irony? And if not then what's your skew idea of irony?

Irony does not mean inconvenient or surprising event. Irony denotes the presence of a contradictory use or attribute of an event or concept: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/irony

My previous post employs an ironic tone. Despite the sacchrine promises of agreement and understanding, the whole ought indicate that I voted for you based on your unwillingness to defend yourself. Consider the following:

We know it isn't your fault, but pmchugh tried the same sort of laid-back approach and we just plum jumped the gun on him.

Literally, it suggests that we mistakenly killed pmchugh, as well as rationalizing your mysteriousness. However, we know that town lynched him because he was proven scum with the same method used today. That clearly belies my avowal that we don't hold you responsible.

To paraphrase the popular song, rain on your wedding day is not ironic. It is inconvenient, but fails to contradict the possibility or symbolism of the primarily indoor ceremony. Unless you asked LSU to not target you or perhaps you saw him targeting someone else last night, his choice falls well short of ironic.

I will admit one sincerity in my previous post. If you do happen to describe four night actions that others - or I - confirm, I will certainly unvote and defend you. However, as you ignored the opportunity again, I will revote to emphasize that I fail to share your patience: I vote Fircoal, in case / doesn't accept the other one