Conquer Club

Trump should have NEVER gone after James Comey, especially with such a weak criminal case against Comey:

Case against Comey appears to be on shaky ground as judge questions prosecutor's handling of indictment

Washington — The Justice Department's criminal case against former FBI Director James Comey appears to be on shaky ground as a judge Wednesday repeatedly questioned federal prosecutors about the validity of the indictment returned by a grand jury and how it was handled by interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan.

During a hearing on Comey's bid to have the charges tossed on the grounds his prosecution is vindictive and selective, U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff pressed government lawyers for clarity about the events that surrounded the grand jury proceedings on Sept. 25, when it voted to indict Comey on two counts related to testimony he provided to Congress in September 2020. He has pleaded not guilty.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/comey-case ... -handling/

Despite Trump denying this was a REVENGE case against Comey, all the evidence suggests OTHERWISE. What a weak case and basically bluster by Trump that will GO NOWHERE. There is NO THERE there against James Comey.

does this mean the tariffs are working?

Why publish bad news?

Courts and Judge(s) continue to Block excesses (imo) of Trump; cases against James Comey and Letitia James are dismissed, by the SAME Federal Judge, a Clinton appointee. As I said earlier, this was an obvious attempt by Trump for political REVENGE. That is blantantly apparent to me.

Judge tosses indictments against James Comey and Letitia James
The judge ruled that the appointment of the prosecutor in the case was invalid.

A federal judge on Monday dismissed the criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James on the grounds that the appointment of the U.S. attorney who brought the indictments was invalid.

The judge dismissed the charges without prejudice, meaning the cases could potentially be refiled by an appropriately appointed U.S. attorney.

U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie concluded that the appointment of Interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan was unconstitutional and that her actions bringing the case were "unlawful" and "ineffective."

https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-dismiss ... =127732668

More stooopidity from the Dems:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... 0222&ei=18

The 2025 Self-Own Award Goes to ... Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota (applause)!

On, Wednesday using the social media platform X, Klobuchar posted a graph that showed average past-due utility balances at an all-time high under President Donald Trump, and yet, as a legion of X users noted, the graph also showed that those balances had skyrocketed under former President Joe Biden.

Incredibly, the graph covered the years 2022-25, a time when Biden's policies, not Trump's, affected outcomes.

A blue line, filled with plot points, reflected a surge in past-due utility balances, particularly from mid-2023 to late 2024.

Well Done, Joe and Amy. "Let's Go, Brandon..!" LIVES ON.

Trump and his cover-up of Epstein Files.

Pack Rat wrote: Wed Dec 03, 2025 8:29 pm Trump and his cover-up of Epstein Files.

Simply more UNPROVEN allegations and, as expected, another PATHETIC and non-refuation attempt by the pee rat who suffers from TDS. Showing such silliness by pee rat is like swatting flies, and sometimes I SQUASH a few. I think the release of the Epestein files is a SQUASH. There is NO THERE there. pee rat has NOTHING else worth posting; he is reduced to a one track wannabee entertainer.

And we realize rats and flies love to spend time around CRAP. SO NO SURPRISE here.

...and he had a noticeable size stain in front of his pants

Trump's triple assault of deporting the most productive workers, shattering America's trading partnernerships with unprovoked trade wars, and slashing subsidies for working-class families, has yielded its predictable fruits. The recession is picking up steam.

Even Trump's lapdog Fox News, has now admitted that his economy is a dumpster fire.
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/topstor ... r-AA1RJDwO

First, as expected, pee rat offers NOTHING but an failed and impotent attempt at an insult.

Now, to address some of Duk's response, NO matter how well things are going, one is able to find a number SOMEWHERE which shows things are NOT PERFECT. So, such data, Duk, indicates are realignment of resources (capital, workers, equipment) to be better utilized.

I think most of us acknowledge that AI will be disruptive to the Economy. And that is what makes the US Economy so productive and good for most folks: The ability to change course as needed to take advantage of new tools, resources, and technology. And yes, some workers and some people and some regions suffer during the transition. One key is to keep the suffering to a reasonable minimum and unemployment money from the Government helps with that. Can the worker use that time to find another job? NOT everyone finds a comparable job and often requires moving and relocation of families.

And (last point for now) Trump is using the tools at his reach to help bring back some manufacturing job to help some folks. It is NOT perfect, but is the first President in recent memory to help the American worker in a significant way. Clinton, hailed as a guru of the Economy, actually caused many US Jobs to go to Mexico and Canada. I am not sure that NAFTA helped the American worker overall.

NAFTA affected U.S. workers in four principal ways. First, it caused the loss of some 700,000 jobs as production moved to Mexico. Most of these losses came in California, Texas, Michigan, and other states where manufacturing is concentrated. To be sure, there were some job gains along the border in service and retail sectors resulting from increased trucking activity, but these gains are small in relation to the loses, and are in lower paying occupations. The vast majority of workers who lost jobs from NAFTA suffered a permanent loss of income.

https://www.epi.org/blog/naftas-impact-workers/

The following article seems to offer a balanced assessment of NAFTA and its replacement, USMCA.

https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/na ... al-economy

Did USMCA help you and your region, Duk? Or did is it cause painful disruption(s)?

If you searched hard enough, you can always find something on the internet, TV or radio to prove your ridiculous and absurd claims. Truth is annoying is it not.

Ignorance is comforting to you and a couple of other renowned posters like yourself.




https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTraub4Au/

Truth and logic is the target of the autocratic ruler wrath.