LOW (21) vs LHDD (28) - LHDD Wins - Final 4/3/18

Finished challenges between two competitive clans.

Moderator: Clan Directors

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
chard
Posts: 351
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:40 pm

LOW (21) vs LHDD (28) - LHDD Wins - Final 4/3/18

Post by chard »

Terms of War

Contacts:
Les Hussards du Dragon
Contact - [player]fairman[/player]
Contact - [player]Paengars[/player]

Legends of War
Contact - [player]chard[/player]

Layout
Best of 49 Games (3 Rounds)
  • 8 Doubles, 8 Triples & 8 Quads per Clan
  • 1 x Tie-Breaker: Triples - Classic, No Fog, Chained, No Spoils
Rules
  • Not allowed: speed, freestyle, beta, manual deploy. poly
  • 12hr fog rule; details to be provided before next turn if broken, or game re-made
  • Trench games must have 20 round limit, no restriction on quantity
  • Each map can only be used twice per clan per clan war but can only be used once per game type (dubs/trips/quads)
  • Each clan will pick the map and settings for exactly half of the games
  • Games will be exchanged in 3 sets
  • Maximum number of games per player is 18 Games. Tie Breaker does not count toward this limit.
Schedule
1st Set: Jan 14
  • 2 Doubles
  • 3 Trips
  • 3 Quads
2nd Round : Jan 28
  • 2 Doubles
  • 3 Trips
  • 3 Quads
3rd Round : Feb 11
  • 4 Doubles
  • 2 Trips
  • 2 Quads
  • 1 Tie-Break
Link to War Page
https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... WarId=2960

Set 1

LOW
Doubles:
Game 17983955 Baltic Crusades
Game 17983956 Poker Club

Trips:
Game 17983957 Feudal Epic
Game 17983958 Conquer Man
Game 17983959 Battle For Iraq!

Quads:
Game 17987013 Hive
Game 17983965 Middle East
Game 17983967 Unification Germany

LHDD
Dubs:
Game 17983585 King's Court II
Game 17983586 Austrum

Trips:
Game 17983590 Rail South America
Game 17983591 Stalingrad
Game 17983593 Rorke's Drift

Quads:
Game 17983594 Hive
Game 17983598 Conquer Rome
Game 17983599 Montreal

Set 2

LOW
Doubles:
Game 18022202 New World
Game 18022223 Spanish Armada

Trips:
Game 18022204 Age Of Realms 2: Magic
Game 18022205 USA
Game 18022206 Northwest Passage

Quads:
Game 18022207 Age Of Merchants
Game 18022209 Eurasia
Game 18022210 England

LHDD
Doubles:
Game 18002335 WWI Gallipoli
Game 18002336 King's Court

Trips:
Game 18002337 WWII Gazala
Game 18002338 King's Court II
Game 18002339 Fractured China

Quads:
Game 18002340 Prohibition Chicago
Game 18002346 Philadelphia
Game 18002347 Salem's Switch

Set 3

LOW
Doubles:
Game 18059763 Conquer Rome
Game 18059764 Clandemonium
Game 18059770 Oasis
Game 18059775 Egypt: Nubia

Trips:
Game 18059776 Flanders 1302
Game 18059777 WWII Western Front
Game 18059783 (Tie-break) Classic

Quads:
Game 18059780 Charleston
Game 18059781 Das Schloss

LHDD
Doubles:
Game 18055763 Classic Cities: Pot Mosbi
Game 18055778 Battle For Iraq!
Game 18055794 Das Schloss
Game 18055796 Three Kingdoms Of Korea

Trips:
Game 18055800 Conquer Man
Game 18056471 Trafalgar

Quads:
Game 18055806 Conquer 500
Game 18055808 Antarctica
Last edited by chard on Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:15 am, edited 28 times in total.
User avatar
davekettering
Posts: 854
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:06 pm

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Post by davekettering »

Need LHDD to agree to these terms before I can issue privs to the contact individuals. Please ensure war acknowledgement is documented.

thank you

Dave
Image
User avatar
fairman
Posts: 679
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 5:22 am
Gender: Male

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Post by fairman »

Challenge accepted !
LHDD agrees to the term
Image

Nous étions là bien avant les targaryens !!
User avatar
davekettering
Posts: 854
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:06 pm

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Post by davekettering »

Please create your war link. Good luck in your war.

Dave
Image
User avatar
fairman
Posts: 679
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 5:22 am
Gender: Male

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Post by fairman »

LHDD officialy ask a delay of 24h to create set 2 and same for round 3 (I prefer to do it the monday instead of sunday for my family life ;-) )
Can you add [player]Paengars[/player]as 2nd contact for LHDD
Image

Nous étions là bien avant les targaryens !!
User avatar
chard
Posts: 351
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:40 pm

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Post by chard »

That is fine. Take whatever time you need.
User avatar
chard
Posts: 351
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:40 pm

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Post by chard »

The dates for Set 2 / 3 have been updated (corrected). They are now as follows...

2nd Round : Jan 28
3rd Round : Feb 11
User avatar
Arama86n
Posts: 2275
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Post by Arama86n »

This is a random war for the giggles?
User avatar
Donelladan
Posts: 3682
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:48 am

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Post by Donelladan »

Just for fun yes.
Image
User avatar
Arama86n
Posts: 2275
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Post by Arama86n »

Nice.
May the best clan win.
User avatar
Arama86n
Posts: 2275
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Post by Arama86n »

Donelladan wrote:Just for fun yes.

Was amusement abound?
Was merriment lurking in the bushes?
Was joy in the air?

Or was there simply blood and mud on a field full of LoW dead, and plenty of crows?
User avatar
Donelladan
Posts: 3682
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:48 am

Re: LOW (12) vs LHDD (22) of 49

Post by Donelladan »

I enjoyed spilling blood on the field, does it count ?

Thanks for the war LOW !
Image
User avatar
fairman
Posts: 679
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 5:22 am
Gender: Male

Re: LOW (16) vs LHDD (24) of 49

Post by fairman »

Looks official .. thanks for the war LoW.
The first set killed you ..
Image

Nous étions là bien avant les targaryens !!
betiko
Posts: 10941
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: location, location

Re: LOW (17) vs LHDD (27) of 49

Post by betiko »

Yes good war guys, 27-17 i see it s official.
Looks like out of the remaining 5 we have 3 victories for you guys, 1 for us and the other undecided but leaning your way.
So this could end up 21-28 and be a much closer score.
Image
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: LOW (17) vs LHDD (27) of 49

Post by iAmCaffeine »

I'm surprised it wasn't a little closer. Both good clans.
Image
User avatar
Gen. Ramsarelli
Posts: 97
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 6:46 am
Gender: Male

Re: LOW (17) vs LHDD (27) of 49

Post by Gen. Ramsarelli »

Thanks for the war, folks! Great job!
User avatar
fairman
Posts: 679
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 5:22 am
Gender: Male

Re: LOW (19) vs LHDD (28) of 49

Post by fairman »

This war is ended, was a toughest fight than the results show.
Image

Nous étions là bien avant les targaryens !!
User avatar
chard
Posts: 351
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:40 pm

Re: LOW (21) vs LHDD (28) of 49 - Completed 2018-04-04

Post by chard »

Final score updated.

Congrats to everyone in LHDD. Very well played!!
User avatar
groovysmurf
Head Clan Director
Head Clan Director
Posts: 2872
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:28 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Cleveland, OH

Re: LOW (21) vs LHDD (28) - LHDD Wins - Final 4/3/18

Post by groovysmurf »

Databases updated, privileges removed, medals awarded, topic moved
Post Reply

Return to “Complete Challenges”