Moderator: Cartographers
The Neon Peon wrote:I liked the first idea with the lines across that portion of the river.
asl80 wrote:ps. just a personal thing, but i think the two arrows depicting attack directions look really out of place, or rather they appear as a "jutting" presence on the map.
e_i_pi wrote:By the way, how did you get those ripples around the continent? I've had trouble getting smooth strokes like that. Outside glow just doesn't seem to have the consistency along the line that I'm after
e_i_pi wrote:By the way, how did you get those ripples around the continent? I've had trouble getting smooth strokes like that. Outside glow just doesn't seem to have the consistency along the line that I'm after
oaktown wrote:I copied the path of the land and made it a bit larger and flattened some bits out, stroked it, then copied that path and stretched it and flattened it out, stroked it a bit lighter, etc. The first one or two were a bit of work because there were so many anchor points I had to knock most of them out to simplify it, but then it was easy.
Limey Lyons wrote:serious confusion with corrientes. what's with the impassable river running through it?
pamoa wrote:I know it will hurt some geographically correct mind but why not remove one part of it and enlarge either Entre Rios or Tucuman
MrBenn wrote:I can't remember if you've tried it without the black borders over the river through the territory? That might help make it a bit clearer, and would make the name more visible...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users