Moderator: Community Team
ooge wrote:on the subject of disrespect for players.This is what I posted in junes forum.
Re: June Challenge: Mandela, a Retrospective
Postby ooge on Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:02 pm
During the St.Paticks day contest if you collected 44 clovers you received a G.A. medal and if you collected 88 clovers you received a challenge medal.2 medals for those who collected 88 clovers.The May challenge medals have been given out and even though The scoreboard said 50 pts G.A. medal,150pts. challenge medal,only 1 medal was given to those with 150pts.This is also going to happen to Junes medal challenge.only the 1 medal.I would have only played for the G.A. medal if I knew I was only getting one. I would have instead played my random games,I would have platinum in it by now instead I ended up wasting my time this past 2 months for a challenge medal instead of a G.A. medal. when you cant trust the wording on a website it becomes a deal breaker as to weather you want to continue with the website.
I really do wish Big wham would look at this and correct a wrong.
jonofperu wrote:Just to clarify... a Doubles game is a 4-player game, but doesn't count for this, right?
Game Type: Standard
biscuit boy wrote:Something to think about in another month is limiting the number of games somebody can create or join. To obtain a green star because you can play in 400 active games at 1 time doesn't necessarily mean you deserve it or the best. Anyway to give a reward on the % of games won in a challenge with a set number of games played or set score as the minimum?
Shannon Apple wrote:biscuit boy wrote:Something to think about in another month is limiting the number of games somebody can create or join. To obtain a green star because you can play in 400 active games at 1 time doesn't necessarily mean you deserve it or the best. Anyway to give a reward on the % of games won in a challenge with a set number of games played or set score as the minimum?
EDIT: Actually I rechecked the scoreboard and you only need 50 points for a challenge medal. They did change it.
But win percentage would indeed be a great way to award rare stars provided that they also meet the 50 point requirement.
Also what the hell? People are seriously whining over not being allowed to use bots. That's common sense. I knew you could play with more than one bot, but I never would have thought it would be allowed in any kind of tournament to begin with. No one should have to make rules about that, but I guess it's necessary. Beating CC's drunken cook bots is definitely not an achievement.
Shannon Apple wrote:JR24 is not a bot You might find him as easy to beat as a bot, but he's still not a bot.
Shannon Apple wrote:This is all about some dumb coloured star now, not even a medal. Sure, I agree as I said in my above post that how those are awarded could use a change to be fair to people who are actually playing well rather than just starting a bunch of games and half playing them. the challenge medal has been made fair this time around.
iAmCaffeine wrote:Now that DY is back in charge I saw promise they would once again improve, but July has proven otherwise.
Dukasaur wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Now that DY is back in charge I saw promise they would once again improve, but July has proven otherwise.
I've enjoyed the July Challenge. Of course, not everybody will.
The settings do not match those required for the game to count for the challenge, (for example only four player games count) check the first post for which settings are required.Synthespian wrote:Confused ... does this map not count?
Game 14593479
philephant wrote:I didn't get a medal for this game. Game Game 14619597
TheFlashPoint wrote:Gosh, b00060 has quite a few points. It would be a shame if people kept joining his games.
I have several up for those looking to get meet the General Achievement requirements.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users