Moderator: Cartographers
tim02
Joined: 17 Mar 2007
Posts: 86
Location: thinking what move to make
Posted: 29 Aug 2007 14:10 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the one thing about having 2 crossings is that one person can have the west front anfd after a couble turns its impossible to break his bonus
boberz Posted: 30 Aug 2007 14:02 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
is there any historical value in the crossings, (just interested not complaining).
Did you think about having a bonus for whole fronts
unriggable Posted: 30 Aug 2007 14:35 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you need more interfrontal connections.
tim02 Posted: 29 Aug 2007 03:27 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I still think you should do something about all that space in russia
KEYOGI Posted: 31 Aug 2007 22:15 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree with unriggable. Gameplay on this map at the moment would be horrible. Not that any of it really matters, because until the guidelines are updated to incorporate bigger maps, this map is only a distant dream.
unriggable
Still thinking you need more connections between fronts
qwert wrote:Well human step on moon,so i belive that one day human will play these map.
KEYOGI
You've produced a nice looking map qwert, it's just I see little value in you continuing to develop it without knowing what the future holds. Is there any chance we will see a WWII Central Front map at any point if you can't continue this map for some time?
hulmey Posted: 01 Sep 2007 08:18 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i don think this should be called the Road to Berlin....The single most important European battle which led to the road to Berlin. Do know which battle im talking about?
d.gishman Posted: 01 Sep 2007 15:11 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I also agree that there should be more connections... right now it's too sparse - or else the map will play very linearly with a lot of bottlenecks
qwert wrote:d.gishman Posted: 01 Sep 2007 15:11 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I also agree that there should be more connections... right now it's too sparse - or else the map will play very linearly with a lot of bottlenecks
Bottlenecks?
Its not easy to create new conection,and not to ruin country balance.
unriggable
You can redo the country's bonus, its not that difficult.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil Posted: 01 Sep 2007 22:08 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bombardment between london and Berlin to represent the blitz and bombing runs on Berlin?
Also that operation whee there was thousands of para troopers send into naziville
just a couple of possible ideas.
unriggable Posted: 01 Sep 2007 23:34 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hamburg - Berlin
London -> Berlin as previously mentioned
Lvov - Hungarian 3rd
Trieste - Vienna
BTW What s the deal with the Segfried defense in the top right?
qwert wrote:new improve version of map.
I apply two more conection(I stay Berlin closed from any conection)
Also i put two version of text and with older version you can look what is best for map.(Poland-1 version)(East Germany-2 version)(rest of map-older version)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users