yeti_c wrote:oaktown wrote:yeti_c wrote:that would eliminate the bottle neck on the left hand side?
yeti, let me know specifically where you identify a bottleneck and I'll see if something else can't be done about it.
By bottleneck, are you actually referring to a dead-end? Because i see three dead-ends: brit, american, and russian; opening up the airfields to more attacks only addresses one of them.
I was referring to the Dead-end that Incandenza identified... between Gatow and Wannsee...
He said you could put a bridge between the two - I thought that this might be a way round it... feel free to ignore though!!!
C.
right, I'm troubled by the dead-ends as well, but there are already so many border terits between the brit and american sectors that I hate adding another yet another attack route.
ā¢ The british sector dead-end I will eliminate on the next update by moving the gatow border north of the bridge to westend, making the attack routes in that part of the map a five territory loop going gatow-westend-charlottenberg-siemenstadt-spandau. No dead-ends.
ā¢ I may add a bridge in the southern part of the russian sector where there are essentially two dead-ends, one you can hold at kopenick and one you can hold at treptow. A Grunau-Muggelheim bridge takes care of both.
ā¢ American sector may have to end up with one dead-end at Wannsee. It could be eliminated by moving the Wannsee border up and in, but personally I think the central part of the region is so wide-open that it's fine. And the right side of the American sector will begin with dead-end behind the neutral airfield, so the player who starts on the left side of the territory deserves a gift.